Brigadier Nkwashu was promoted through various ranks from 2000 to 2018 and held positions in vehicle crime investigation and as a station commander.
“when I was promoted, ja, 2002 when I was promoted to be a Captain...then in 2005, to be a Superintendent...then I was again promoted to Senior Superintendent...moved to Vereeniging Vehicle Crime Investigation Unit as a Commander...in 2012 I was working as a Detective Head and as, with the rank of Colonel...appointed as a Station Commander...promoted to the rank of Brigadier...Station Commander at Atteridgeville SAPS”
Brigadier Nkwashu gave an affidavit voluntarily in response to summons to appear at the Judicial Commission of Inquiry regarding allegations of interference in the bail proceedings of Michael Pule Tau, demand for the Armand Swart murder docket, and relationship with Katiso Molefe.
“I make this affidavit voluntarily in response to the summons/subpoena...directing me to appear... in relation to my attempts to interfere the bail proceedings of Michael Pule Tau. The second one was my demand for the Armand Swart murder docket, and my relationship or connection with Katiso Molefe...”
Between 2018 and 2022 Brigadier Nkwashu was appointed District Commissioner temporarily and from 2022 he was transferred to Vereeniging as Deputy District Commissioner where he is currently serving.
“between 2018 and 2022, wherein between I was appointed...to be District Commissioner a few occasions. From 2022, I was then transferred to Vereeniging...and appointed as Deputy District Commissioner and, which is where I am currently serving.”
UNATTRIBUTEDDay 95 · 22 Apr 2026Refers to: 2018-2022Location: Vereeniging, Sedibeng district
Brigadier Nkwashu explains that Fundiswa Nyangule is the customary wife of Katiso Molefe and that Fundiswa became like a babysister to him due to family ties and customs.
“I will then first explain my first relationship with Fundiswa Nyangule, the customary wife of Katiso Molefe...all my subsequent interactions with Katiso, including the events that gave rise to the allegation of bail interference, flow directly from that family bond that I had with Fundiswa...Fundiswa became like a baby sister to me.”
Brigadier Nkwashu states his actions regarding demand for Armand Swart docket were pursuant to lawful instruction from the Provincial Commissioner and he denies any improper conduct.
“I will...show that my actions were pursuant to lawful instruction from the Provincial Commissioner...There was no improper conduct on my part.”
Chairperson clarifies the meaning of 'customary wife' distinct from cohabiting partners without formal marriage bond under vernacular practice.
“some people usually use that term, customary wife or customary husband, to refer to what I would loosely call vernacular or people who are cohabiting with no formal marriage bond, which is different from a customary marriage...and the spouses in a customary marriage, which is not the same thing as...vernacular people that are cohabiting.”
Brigadier Nkwashu details how Fundiswa became part of his family through a relationship with his wife's younger brother Sazi, who paid lobola for Fundiswa and lived close to their family.
“My wife had a younger brother named Sazi...Sazi lived with my wife and myself...During that time, he met Fundiswa...They developed a romantic relationship...Sazi found work at the Police...and he managed to buy his own house, and thereafter...he paid lobola for Fundiswa. They lived in a house close to ours, and spent much time with our family over the years. Fundiswa became like a baby sister to me.”
Sazi came to Johannesburg in the late 1990s or early 2000s; lobola for Fundiswa was paid in 1999; they bought their own house about a year later and stayed there.
“Sazi came to Johannesburg in the late, in the early 90’s, ja...in 1999 we paid lobola for Fundiswa...and then I think a year down the line, they bought their own house, and they stayed in their own house.”
The lobola negotiations involved other family members beyond just Brigadier Nkwashu and his wife’s family unit, including an uncle who does not stay with them.
“There is an uncle who is not staying with us...there were others.”
Sazi passed away on 14 May 2000, not 14 May 2002 as initially printed, and was tragically shot.
“I think that there was a printing error ... on or about 14 May 2002, Sazi passed away. In actual fact, he passed away on 14 May 000. Tragically, he got shot”
In Mpondo or Xhosa tradition, the ingxotha ceremony is pivotal for the sending off of the married girl to join her new family, involving irreversible obligations for the husband’s family.
“In the Mpondo or Xhosa tradition, the ingxotha ceremony ... which means the sending off of the married girl ... Her ancestral protection and daily life now belong to her husband's lineage”
Because of the ingxotha ritual, the bride's integration into the husband's family is complete and irreversible under Mpondo customary law, creating obligations even after the husband's death.
“Because of ingxotha, the bride's integration into the husband's family is complete and irreversible ... Custom demanded that I protect and support her as if she were my own blood sister ... The ritual had already taken place when Sazi died ... ingxotha is not dissolved by death”
Sazi had an older brother who was not the breadwinner as he was unemployed, so the speaker fulfilled that role.
“Sazi had an elder brother who was staying in KZN and me, actually, I would say I was a breadwinner . . . his biological older brother was a person who was not working”
After approximately a year of mourning following Sazi’s death, the family told Fundiswa she was free to remarry and enter into another relationship if she wished.
“After about a year of Sazi's passing, the family ... decided that we inform her that ... she was free then to enter into any other relationship and remarry again if she wished to”
Customary law required protecting and supporting Fundiswa as if she were the speaker’s own blood sister, including facilitating her remarriage if she chose.
“Customary law therefore required me to treat Fundiswa as my own blood sister ... I had to protect and support her, including facilitating her remarriage if she chose to”
Brigadier Nkhwashu left the meeting when Fundiswa insisted on marrying the already married man, disapproving the marriage.
“I decided I was not happy to hear that he is a married guy and I said to her ... Then I left the meeting at that and she decided to continue on her own”
The customary marriage between Fundiswa and the man took place because lobola negotiations occurred, lobola was paid, and rituals of customary marriage were engaged in.
“I called it like that because I learned afterwards that that event took place”
Brigadier Nkhwashu's relationship with Fundiswa is a traditional family bond related to Mpondo custom and is not based on any improper association.
“My relationship with Fundiswa is not based on any improper association . It is a traditional family bond related to Mpondo custom and in the ordinary human ties of care for a woman who become my sister through marriage”
Any assistance B R I G A D I E R N K H W A S H U gave to Fundiswa or her husband, including lending a vehicle, helping deliver clothes to her husband in prison, or meeting with Katiso, was done out of customary duty and family bond.
“Any assistance I gave to her or her husband must be understood in that light. Further to this, Fundiswa's entire family passed on . . . I lent her a vehicle, helped her deliver clothes to her husband in prison or meeting with Katiso”
Brigadier Nkhwashu met with Katiso towards the end of June 2024 after Fundiswa requested a meeting.
“My meetings with Katiso started towards the end of June 2024... Fundiswa gave me a call and requested a meeting with me and we made arrangements to meet and we finally met in Alberton in a restaurant.”
B R I G A D I E R N K H W A S H UDay 95 · 22 Apr 2026Refers to: June 2024Location: Alberton
Fundiswa needed to conclude her family's estate as all her family died.
“She informed me that amongst others, the reason she needed to see me was because she needed to conclude her family's estate as I alluded earlier on that all her family died”
Brigadier Nkhwashu gave Fundiswa guidance on dealing with the estate and recommended visiting the Master of High Court and getting a lawyer.
“I gave her guidance on how to deal with the estate with my little knowledge that she must visit the Master of High Court and where she is experiencing challenges, she must just get the services of a lawyer who will assist her further”
The meeting arranged between Brigadier Nkhwashu and Katiso in Alberton at the end of June 2024 was arranged by Fundiswa to facilitate introduction.
“Indeed, a meeting was arranged between Katiso and myself... It was arranged by Fundiswa, because she has the one who requested me to meet the husband and telling me that the husband wanted to meet me also... Fundiswa was there to introduce the husband...”
B R I G A D I E R N K H W A S H UDay 95 · 22 Apr 2026Refers to: End of June 2024Location: Alberton
Fundiswa was unhappy that Brigadier Nkhwashu had never met her husband Katiso because of loyalty to Sazi and because he was angry at her marrying a married man.
“Fundiswa stated that she is not happy that I had never met her husband Katiso as she has a relationship with me and she would like me to meet her husband and I had my personal reasons, among others being my loyalty to Sazi, and the earlier reasons that I stated that I was angry for her to go marry a married man”
Brigadier Nkhwashu and Katiso discussed general personal circumstances and Katiso mentioned involvement in various business interests including security sector, and suggested potential employment after Brigadier's retirement from SAPS.
“When I met Katiso, we conversed generally about our respective personal circumstances... He mentioned that he was involved in various business interests, including the security sector... He indicated that I was approaching retirement from the SAPS... he will want security forces to come and work there, so should I be interested when I retire I can just go into work with him in that space with my experience as a police officer... I accepted and then I said no, I will be interested, but we will talk, because there are processes to undergo.”
B R I G A D I E R N K H W A S H UDay 95 · 22 Apr 2026Refers to: End of June 2024
Meeting in Alberton attended by four people: Brigadier Nkhwashu, Fundiswa, Brigadier's 17-year-old nephew, and Fundiswa's husband Katiso, who was introduced then Fundiswa left them alone.
“In that meeting it was the only four of us and Fundiswa came with my nephew and then she introduced us and then after introducing us she left us, she left the two of us to talk man to man.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu was approached at the meeting end about a friend of Katiso who had been arrested and needed to know if state would oppose bail; Brigadier refused to discuss work related cases with Katiso.
“Katiso who I am now knowing as my brother-in-law, now calling him Boet K, he told me that a friend of his had been arrested and he needed to know if the state will oppose bail as he wanted to pay the bail money for his friend... I just stopped him and say 'Swear, me I do not talk work related cases with anyone, not even my wife... '”
Brigadier Nkhwashu denied discussing the arrested friend case with Katiso as it involved his own case and he considered it improper to talk about it.
“I was not thinking of anything big, but I was just thinking that... if you are coming to talk about the case that I am involved... where your friend was arrested and was arrested by me and you need some bail, I do not talk about that.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu discussed a social gathering with police officers including Sergeant Lebogang Tshukudu, where they talked about escorting suspects, including a police officer suspect named Michael Pule Tau.
“After that meeting, Fundiswa contacted me to enquire how the meeting had gone. I informed her ... The gathering was attended mainly by the police officers ... including Sergeant Lebogang Tshukudu ... Tshukudu and I have been friends since around 2017 ... During the stock fair, Sergeant Tshukudu and the colleagues mentioned that they were ... escorting suspects ... Amongst the suspects that they were escorting, there was a police officer suspect ... Michael Pule Tau”
Brigadier Nkhwashu made a connection that the bail application discussed was related to Michael Pule Tau, due to a request involving his brother-in-law Katiso seeking assistance with the bail of a friend.
“As the conversation went on, it triggered my mind that they are talking about the case that my brother-in-law, Katiso, was intending to lure me to assist him in the bail of this particular person ... this Pule Tau was going for bail application ... I put the puzzle together that this is where Katiso was coming to”
Brigadier Nkhwashu acknowledges he mentioned his conversation with Katiso to Tshukudu in a social gathering, emphasizing it was a general comment and he does not discuss work with strangers.
“I acknowledge that I mentioned my conversation with Katiso to Tshukudu in a social gathering ... I do not discuss work with people that I do not know ... The person that I have just met now then is talking about cases and that is unethical for me ... I dismissed him”
Brigadier Nkhwashu states he never asked Sergeant Tshukudu to approach Witness B or convey any message about Tau's bail application and denies improper interference in the bail proceedings of Tau.
“I never asked Tshukudu to do so ... I never asked Tshukudu to convey any message to Witness B ... I deny that I attempted to interfere improperly in the bail proceedings of Tau ... I specifically deny that I instructed or requested or authorized Sergeant Tshukudu to contact Witness B or any other person regarding Tau's bail ... I did not ask Tshukudu to find out whether the state will oppose bail ... I did not ask him to plead for bail ... I did not ask him to pass any thank you message to Witness B after Tau was granted bail”
Brigadier Nkhwashu says it would be unusual and improper for him to send a sergeant to another sergeant to request bail assistance, given his 26 years as a detective investigating officer and commander.
“I have had 26 years as a Detective Investigating Officer and a Commander, not to know how bail is granted ... I would not have sent a Sergeant to go and talk to a Sergeant to request for bail or ask anything about a case or bail ... I find it very sinister that I will send, at my level, a Sergeant to go and talk to another Sergeant looking for a bail ...”
Brigadier Nkwashu coordinated obtaining dockets from Detective Commanders after receiving instructions, except for two dockets one of which was with the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP).
“I received all the dockets but two. I thereafter enquired about the dockets. Immediately thereafter, I received a call from Witness B ... stating that she was not able to provide me with one of the dockets as she did not have the docket with her as that docket was taken by the DPP.”
Brigadier Nkwashu states he acted on instructions from the Provincial Commissioner to collect all case dockets with J50 warrants and submit them to Deputy Provincial Commissioner Major General Mbuso Khumalo.
“I was acting on instruction from the Provincial Commissioner to collect all case dockets that had J50 warrants of arrest and to submit them to the Deputy Provincial Commissioner of Detective Services, Major General Mbuso Khumalo.”
Major General Khumalo was to oversee investigations directed by Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi, including multiple dockets from all five districts within Gauteng.
“Major General Khumalo was to oversee those investigations as directed by the Premier of Gauteng, Mr Panyaza Lesufi. The instructions was not limited to the Katiso case. It applied to many dockets from all five districts within the Gauteng Province.”
The speaker states they recused themselves from handling a specific docket related to the Armand Swart murder because they were informed their name was mentioned in connection with the Tau matter and were under investigation.
“I simply recused myself from handling that docket, because I knew I was under investigation.”
The docket for the Armand Swart murder was transferred to the Organized Crime Unit at the Provincial Headquarters where Witness B is working, and the speaker authorized this transfer.
“the docket...was transferred to the Organized Crime Unit at the Provincial Headquarters where Witness B is working”
Brigadier Nkhwashu confirmed the instruction to transfer the docket was given in writing via an email to all District Commissioners after being orally given at the top management meeting of the province.
“the instruction...was in writing...given at the top management meeting...and...distributed...via email to all District Commissioners”
Brigadier Nkhwashu was the Acting District Commissioner and made the sole decision to transfer the docket of the Armand Swart murder to the Provincial Head Office.
“I was the Acting District Commissioner, and the decision to transfer this docket was solely on my shoulders”
The custodian of a case docket is typically the area where the initial crime occurred, and investigations within a jurisdiction are normally carried out by officers from that jurisdiction unless given a mandate to external units such as the Independent Police Investigative Directorate or the Organized Crime unit.
“the custodian of a case docket is the area where the crime took place...all cases within my jurisdiction will be investigated within my jurisdiction unless there is a mandate given to external units such as the Independent Police Investigative Directorate and the Organized Crime unit”
The process for docket flow involves assigning a serial case number at the police station, registering the case at the Community Service Centre, and then assigning it to a detective component; the Detective Commander, usually of Colonel rank, signs for the docket and assigns it to an Investigating Officer.
“The docket flow...will get a serial number...registered and assigned to the detective component...The Commander...sign for that particular docket and...assign that particular docket for investigation to an Investigating Officer”
The process of docket transfer in the police system involves registering the docket under the name of the current investigating officer and then transferring it within the system with authorization, either verbal or written.
“when the Investigating Officer receives that particular docket, he signs for that particular docket ... after signing for that particular docket in the system, which we call it CAS control system, the Investigating Officer is now responsible for that particular docket”
The transfer of dockets within the police involves updating the national system to indicate the movement of the docket even if the transfer is not done in writing.
“when the docket is registered in the system ... it must be received in the system that will indicate overall on the national system that this docket has now been moved”
Suspects related to a docket may be arrested outside the jurisdiction of the initial investigating officer, and an authorization for the docket transfer is then given to the unit with the mandate to investigate.
“when the suspects were arrested, they were arrested outside my jurisdiction ... the Investigating Officer told me they want to request that they sign for the docket because they have established ... this falls within their mandate”
On 6 December 2024, Brigadier Nkhwashu learned from Fundiswa that Katiso had been arrested but did not know the charges; Katiso appeared in court on 9 December 2024.
“On 6 December 2024, I learned from Fundiswa that Katiso had been arrested ... On 9 December 2024, Katiso appeared in Vereeniging Magistrate Court”
Mr Molefe was admitted to Groenpunt correctional facility, despite initial uncertainty if he was registered there as an awaiting trial detainee.
“Mr Mkhuliphi ... to enquire whether Mr Molefe had been admitted at that facility... he came back to me ... to confirm that Mr Molefe is indeed in the facility registered”
The visitor was unable to see Mr Molefe personally but was allowed to deliver clothing which would be handed over to him later.
“he told me that it is late after hours and that he could not accept my food delivery to Katiso and he will not allow me to see Katiso but he will take the clothing and hand it over to Katiso”
The visitor denied attempting to interfere with the detainee's case and stated their conduct was a personal and humanitarian act to assist their sister.
“I denied that I attempted to interfere in any manner... My conduct was limited to assisting my sister by facilitating the delivery of clothing to her husband while he was in custody. This was a personal and humanitarian act”
Brigadier Nkhwashu denies allegations of removing vehicle number plate to conceal identity when visiting Groenpunt Prison.
“I deny these allegations because it did not happen. I could not conceal my identity after having spoken to the area commissioner and identified myself... When I arrived at the gate to the officials there, I also identified myself”
Brigadier Nkhwashu says his car was new and had a temporary permit, not formal registration plates, issued by Omar's Motors dealership in Meyerton, Vereeniging.
“The truth is that my car was new at the time and had not yet been issued with a formal registration plate. It was fitted with a temporary permit... issued from the dealership where I bought this particular vehicle, which is Omar's Motors, Meyerton, Vereeniging”
Brigadier Nkhwashu denies wrongdoing and misconduct allegations and states his career has been dedicated to SAPS with integrity.
“I deny that I have aided or abetted any criminal activity or failed to act on credible intelligence or internal warnings or benefited financially or politically from any criminal syndicate. I did not. I have dedicated my career to the South African Police Service and acted with integrity. I am being prejudiced by allegations that are vague and not yet tested”
Brigadier Nkhwashu denies any wrongdoing related to the allegations and is willing to cooperate with the Commission's enquiries subject to fair process rights.
“I deny any wrongdoing whatsoever in this regard. I am willing to cooperate with the Commission's legitimate enquiries to the extent that such cooperation does not infringe upon my right to a fair process and my right against self-incrimination. I request that the Commission make a finding that there is no basis for the allegations made against me and that the SAPS immediately withdraw my suspension proceedings against me because I am not the criminal that the media suggests”
Brigadier Nkhwashu acknowledges a second visit to Groenpunt Prison in or about February 2025 but previously omitted to mention it due to pressure from summons and evidence focusing only on December visit.
“I failed to mention a second visit that took place in or about February 2025. I acknowledge that this was an omission... The pressure that I was subjected to. The summons and the evidence presented to the Commission focused exclusively on the visit during December”
In February 2025, while still on leave, Brigadier Nkwashu's sister Fundiswa Nyangule contacted him to inform that she was coming to Gauteng to visit her husband Katiso Molefe in prison and asked for a lift from the airport.
“In February 2025, while I was still on leave, my sister, Fundiswa Nyangule, who... contacted me. She informed me that she was coming to Gauteng to visit her husband in prison... She asked if I could fetch her from the airport because she was coming from Durban... I agreed and I went to the airport and picked her up. We drove together to Groenpunt Prison.”
Brigadier Nkwashu complied with all prison security checks during the visit and did not use his rank to gain improper access to Katiso Molefe.
“I was not given any preferential treatment. I waited my turn. I complied with the security checks. I wish to state clearly and unequivocally that... I did not use my rank to gain improper access. I was there primarily to drive my sister, who was a local visitor.”
Brigadier Nkwashu has been to the White House (Northcliff Hotel) several times, which has been described as a hub for corrupt activities involving senior SAPS officials, politicians, and organised crime figures.
“I wish to inform the Commission that I have been to the White House on several occasions. The White House is a private property... described as a hub for corrupt activities involving senior SAPS officials, politicians and organised crime figures.”
Social gatherings at the White House were arranged by colleagues, notably Maj-Gen Richard Shibiri, and involved mostly police officers with occasional civilians such as the hotel owner.
“The gatherings at the White House were ordinarily arranged by our colleagues or our colleague, Maj-Gen Richard Shibiri... it was ordinarily to bring camaraderie... to foster those working relationships and to de-stress after work with officers from different units... from time to time ... some of the civilians, in the likes of the owner of the Boutique Hotel...”
General Richard Shibiri was responsible for inviting police officers to the social gatherings at the White House, and attendees did not know how other police officers were invited.
“All I know is that General Shibiri was the one who was inviting me and General Mthombeni... I have never known how they got invited and by whom.”
The social gatherings at the White House were not secret, involved many officers, and no discussions took place that could compromise justice.
“The gatherings were not secret... Many officers attended and we held general discussions. There was no discussion of ongoing criminal investigation in a manner that could compromise the administration of justice. At least not in my presence...”
Investigating officer Witness B may have attended some of the social gatherings at the White House.
“Investigating officer, Witness B, may have attended some of these social gatherings because I started getting to know it from this Commission when General Shibiri was testifying and when Witness B was also testifying.”
Investigating officers have exclusive control over their docket, and complaints against police investigation progress may be lodged and escalated within the police command structure.
“The investigating officers signed for the docket... From that moment, the IO becomes the sole custodian and possessor of that particular docket... The docket is under the IO's exclusive control... The complaint will then be registered with the commander at the CSC and then the complaint file will then be booked to a commission officer to investigate the complaint against the police... The commander may call the IO to account and may escalate the matter to a higher level if necessary. Complaints can be escalated to the District Commissioners, the Provincial...”
The Provincial Commissioner General Mthombeni instructed District Commissioners, including the acting District Commissioner for Sedibeng, to collect all dockets involving J50 warrants of arrest and deliver them to Maj-Gen Mbuso Khumalo for oversight and review.
“A complaint was lodged with the South African Police Service Provincial Commissioner, General Mthombeni. General Mthombeni decided to instruct District Commissioners, including me as acting District Commissioner for Sedibeng, to collect all dockets that had J50 warrants of arrest and to deliver them to the Deputy Provincial Commissioner of detective service, which is Maj-Gen Mbuso Khumalo, for oversight and review.”
The docket for the incident involving J50 warrant was created on the day of the incident in Sedibeng and was transferred to the organised crime unit the same day with authorization from Brigadier Nkwashu.
“I authorised it on the very same day . But I cannot confirm whether the capturing on the system was done the same day. It could have been done the following day or time after . But the authority that the docket could be transferred to the provincial office organised crime was given the same day.”
BRIGADIER NKWASHUDay 95 · 22 Apr 2026Refers to: April 2025Location: Sedibeng District
Physically, the docket transferred to organised crime means the docket is now held by someone in organised crime and is no longer physically with the original district.
“So, when the docket is transferred to organised crime , it is the physical docket . It means that physical docket is now with somebody else and that somebody else is organised crime .”
The Ford Raptor vehicle registered in Brigadier Nkwashu's name was driven by Fundiswa, Katiso's girlfriend, on 5 March 2025 outside the Vereeniging Magistrate Court and was lawfully acquired from Nkwashu's eldest daughter who paid for it through Nkwashu, the registered owner.
“The Ford Raptor vehicle was indeed my private vehicle that was driven by Fundiswa on that day . And I purchased this particular vehicle lawfully from my eldest daughter , who was paying for it through me , since I am the registered owner of this particular vehicle.”
BRIGADIER NKWASHUDay 95 · 22 Apr 2026Refers to: 5 March 2025Location: Vereeniging Magistrate Court
The docket remained registered as a Sedibeng docket even though physically it was with organised crime because the serial (CAS) number does not change station of origin.
“By virtue of it having the serial number that I spoke about , which is called a CAS number , it will not change that it was registered in Vereeniging . That is why it remained in Sedibeng .”
Brigadier Nkwashu was not driving the Ford Raptor vehicle on 5 March 2025 and was not present at the court in Vereeniging that day, and he had lent the vehicle to Fundiswa because she was afraid of being followed and could not use her own car safely.
“I was not driving the vehicle on the 5th of March . I was not present at the court either in Vereeniging on that day . I borrowed this particular vehicle to Fundiswa , who is my sister . She came to Gauteng to visit her husband in prison . She explained to me that she suspected people following her and she was afraid to use her car because it is known .”
BRIGADIER NKWASHUDay 95 · 22 Apr 2026Refers to: 5 March 2025Location: Vereeniging
Brigadier Nkwashu disclosed openly to prison officials on 9 December 2024 who he is and disclosed the relationship with Mr Molefe, but Mr Molefe later denied knowing Nkwashu as a relative when interviewed by the prison head Mr Nkoli on 10 December 2024.
“On paragraph 30 : " I alluded to the fact that the Commission has evidence from the prison head, Mr Nkoli , that on 10 December 2024 , the day after my first visit in Groenpunt , he interviewed Mr Molefe and asked him whether he was related to me or not . According to Mr Nkoli , Mr Molefe said he was not my brother-in-law and did not know me as a relative ." ... I disclosed openly to the prison officials on the 9th of December who am I . And I disclosed it in my main statement .”
Two days after Sazi Khuboni's death in 2000, Ms Nyangule's mother also passed away, but some siblings of Fundiswa were still alive then.
“Mr Khuboni passes away in the year 2000 ... two days later, Ms Nyangule's mother also passes away ... there were still siblings of Fundiswa to my recollection ... I think there were two who were still alive”
Brigadier Nkwashu confirms that Ms Nyangule's wife side had other siblings, including a younger sister and a younger brother who was younger than Sazi.
“there were other siblings who were the younger brother ... there is a younger sister of my wife and a younger brother of my wife who was younger than Sazi”
In 2005, Fundiswa told Brigadier Nkwashu that she met a man who wanted to marry her and they interviewed her about this.
“during 2005, Fundiswa came to us to come and tell us that ... she met a guy, this guy wanted to marry her ... we sat down and interviewed her ... in 2005”
Brigadier Nkwashu questioned Fundiswa about the background of the man she wanted to marry, and learned he was married, leading to his disapproval of the marriage.
“we came to a question of having to tell her the background of this particular guy ... she said yes ... this guy is a married man ... I get to differ with her on her intentions to marry this guy because of his marriage status”
Brigadier Nkwashu says his relationship with Fundiswa was dented and meetings ended in 2005 due to disagreements, but he tried to convince his wife otherwise.
“in the absence of perhaps a suitable word, it was dented ... we did not finish the meeting with me on that day because we were not agreeing in terms ... i abandoned the meeting with the sole intention of convincing my wife ... no, I do not go with that, not unless I am convinced otherwise”
Between 2014 and 2024, Brigadier Nkwashu and Fundiswa were talking over the phone infrequently, about three to four times in total, with a strained relationship post 2014.
“from 2014 we were just talking over the phone with Fundiswa ... I never actually met her ... over that entire period ... it was maybe not even four times ... three to four calls”
Brigadier Nkhwashu was upset and disappointed that Fundiswa was marrying someone who was already married, and communication between them stopped as a result.
“you were angry , you were upset that she was marrying somebody who was already married . And you wanted nothing to do with that . So , I am assuming because of that , I will call it disappointment , I will not say anger . That disappointment , there was no communication between you and her after that”
Brigadier Nkhwashu recalls being told that Fundiswa was married to the man she was allegedly marrying and that she was staying in Durban, suggesting he might have spoken to her but did not hear she was married.
“I remember knowing that I remember having been told that Fundiswa was married to that guy that you were talking about . And she is staying in Durban . So that could meant that , although I do not have a good recollection , but that could meant that I might have spoken to her , but I did not hear , what I could remember is that I did not hear from her that she was married to that guy”
Between 2014 and 2024, Fundiswa was being chased around Gauteng for unknown reasons which prompted her to move to Durban, including an incident of house robbery which involved changes of residence.
“between 2014 and 2024 , much as I do not remember how many calls we had , I remember that there was a moment when she was being chased around when she was in Gauteng . Which is what I thought , that is what prompted her to move to Durban . Because there were people chasing her around for what we did not know . Because at some stages she was - there was a house robbery and I was called and she moved from Meadowlands to Roodepoort sometime and then she moved from Roodepoort to Fourways and during that time I was on the case of trying to assist in protecting her”
A family member very close to Fundiswa (also sister to Brigadier Nkhwashu's wife) regularly called Brigadier Nkhwashu with updates about Fundiswa because of their close relationship.
“there are a family member who is very , very close to Fundiswa . It is also the sister to my wife . So , she would call and say , Fundiswa had this and this and this , because they knew we were very , very close with Fundiswa”
Fundiswa had a conversation with Brigadier Nkhwashu about meeting Mr Molefe, whom Brigadier Nkhwashu had only heard about in 2005 and never met before 2024.
“you say that in this meeting she then had a conversation with you about meeting Mr Molefe . ... Now , when this happens , you had not met Mr Molefe at all . And , in fact , on your version , you had only heard about him in 2005 .”
Fundiswa asked Brigadier Nkhwashu for assistance regarding her deceased family estate, including siblings.
“she asks you about assistance in relation to her family estate , her deceased family estate . So , at this point , does that include no while siblings , or was this in relation to her mother ? ... Also including the siblings , because she said , I remember when we were talking about not being wanting to narrate too much and disclose certain hidden things , talk about the estate of the brother”
Between 2014 and 2024, Fundiswa contacted Brigadier Nkhwashu requesting a meeting, coming from Durban specifically to meet him.
“those few calls that happened in between 2014 and 2024 , you then get a calls saying she is requesting to meet , correct ? ... And for this meeting she comes from Durban .”
ADV POOE and BRIGADIER NKHWASHUDay 95 · 22 Apr 2026Refers to: 2014-2024Location: Durban
Brigadier Nkhwashu found the request to meet Mr Molefe strange given that the couple married in 2021 but the request came in 2024; he conveyed this feeling to Fundiswa.
“did you find it at all strange that this request was coming in 2024 when they got married in 2021 and you started knowing of him and his intention to marry in 2005 ? ... Of course , Advocate , I find it strange . ... Yes , of course . As we were discussing , I asked politely ... I said , oh , okay . It is fine .”
Brigadier Nkhwashu was asked by Fundiswa why her husband wanted to meet him; Fundiswa said it was not good that they did not know each other and that her husband was willing to meet him.
“I asked her , why does your husband want to meet me ? She say , it is not good that you guys do not know one another . Yet , me , I communicate with you now and then . And now , my husband is more than willing to meet you . And I want , me as Fundiswa , I want you to meet my husband”
Brigadier Nkhwashu stated that Mr Molefe was married but divorcing his wife, which was the reason he was no longer considered a married man, which made Brigadier Nkhwashu willing to meet him.
“Is he no longer married ? No , no , no , he is divorcing with his wife . So , he will come and confirm it to you . So , he is no longer a married man . So , I said , oh , okay . It is fine .”
Brigadier Nkhwashu knew Mr Molefe only as a businessman and had never checked or asked about him prior to the meeting.
“outside of what you know of him , which is he is a businessman and he was married , did you know anything else about Mr Molefe ? ... And had you checked on Mr Molefe , who he is ? ... Or asked anyone about him ? ... No , no , not at that stage”
During the meeting with Mr Molefe, the conversation was very general and included his business interests and the security sector.
“the two of you , you say , talked on very general terms , you say ? ... Including that he told you about his various business interests and the security sector .”
Mr Molefe discussed with Brigadier Nkhwashu a tender for security services at Machabeng, potentially involving Brigadier Nkhwashu after retirement.
“he told you about this various business interests and the security sector . ... He had a tender . I think you said Machabeng . ... It is a multi-billion tender , and I am needing three security companies to be in this particular area . And as you say , you are nearing retirement . I think it can assist you in your retirement , if you choose to .”
Brigadier Nkwashu was initially not convinced but started to give a man a benefit of doubt regarding his character and personal situation including being in the process of a divorce.
“B u t s t i l l , I w a s n o t c o n v i n c e d , b u t a l i t t l e b i t c o n v i n c e d t o t h i n k t h a t m a y b e h e i s t r y i n g t o q u a l i f y t h a t h e i s a g o o d m a n f o r m y s i s t e r . B e c a u s e h e e v e n t o l d m e t h a t h e i s i n t h e p r o c e s s o f a d i v o r c e”
Brigadier Nkhwashu was still cautious and wary about the meeting with Mr Molefe despite the tender opportunity presented.
“I was still cagey as to exactly why did he want to come and meet me . Because he was just telling me , introducing himself , telling me his upbringings , going to school , and he is a businessman ...”
Brigadier Nkwashu was starting to like the man and was open about the idea of running a security company and retiring towards that direction.
“Y e s , I m u s t b e h o n e s t . I a m s t a r t i n g t o l i k e t h e m a n a n d o p e n u p n o w . A h , t h i s i s a g o o d i d e a t o k n o w o u r p l a n s w e l l , y o u k n o w . I g o t a n e x p e r i e n c e w h e r e I c a n r u n s e c u r i t y a n d I w i l l s t a r t r e g i s t e r i n g s e c u r i t y c o m p a n y . A n d I t h i n k I w i l l b e p e n s i o n i n g t o w a r d s t h e r i g h t d i r e c t i o n”
Brigadier Nkwashu described a friend who was arrested and was seeking bail, and said he stopped the man on his tracks before details were disclosed, refusing to discuss work cases even with his wife.
“O n e o f t h o s e f r i e n d s t h a t I w a s t a l k i n g a b o u t e a r l i e r o n i s a r r e s t e d a n d I h e a r h e i s a r r e s t e d b y y o u . A n d h e i s s e e k i n g b a i l a n d I s a i d o h , s w a e r , w a i t , w a i t , w a i t , m y b r o t h e r . Th a t i s w h e n I s t a r t e d - I s t o p p e d h i m o n h i s t r a c k s t o t e l l m e t h e d e t a i l s . B e f o r e h e e v e n t e l l s m e w h o t h i s f r i e n d i s , t h e n I s t a r t e d c h a n g i n g t o s a y , I d o n o t d i s c u s s w o r k c a s e s . A n d I n o t e v e n d i s c u s s w o r k w i t h m y w i f e”
Brigadier Nkwashu refused to discuss work related matters even with his wife, emphasizing respect and maintaining boundaries; he stated that discussing work might risk his job and that his work is off-limits for discussion.
“S o , i f y o u w a n t m e a n d y o u t o h a v e a s o u n d r e l a t i o n s h i p , s w a e r , l e t u s n o t t a l k a b o u t m y w o r k b e c a u s e i f w e s t a r t t a l k i n g a b o u t m y w o r k n o w , I a m d o i n g s o m e t h i n g t h a t I w i l l l o s e m y w o r k . I d o n o t t a l k a b o u t m y w o r k . L e t u s r e s p e c t o n e a n o t h e r f o r t h a t .”
Brigadier Nkwashu interpreted a conversation with the man as an attempt to entice him with a business offer so as to prompt a favour related to a detained friend.
“I t c a m e a c r o s s m y m i n d t h a t , n o , I T h i n k e v e n t h i s t h i n g o f t h e b u s i n e s s , h e w a s j u s t t r y i n g t o e n t i c e m e s o t h a t w h e n w e c o m e t o t h e i s s u e o f t h e f r i e n d s h i p , h e i s o f f e r i n g m e , a n d I w i l l p e r h a p s a l s o d o h i m a f a v o u r .”
Brigadier Nkhwashu did not convey any discomfort experienced in his meeting with Mr Molefe to Ms Nyangule at the time, but only at a later stage after the Stokvel meeting.
“No. I did not at that time, Advocate, but at a later stage.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu has had a good friendship with Sergeant Tshukudu since 2017 but was not his supervisor and only knew him as an officer in a different unit.
“... you just deal briefly with your relationship with Sergeant Tshukudu and you say that you have been good friends since 2017... And has he ever worked under you? No, Commissioners. So you have only ever known him as an officer in a different unit? Correct, Commissioners.”
The Stokvel is not a police stokvel but is mainly composed of police officers with some civilians.
“It is not a police stokvel, Commissioners. However, the members of that stokvel is mainly police officers. And, of course, there will be two or three other civilians. But, in majority, we will be sitting in places where, or should I say, me, myself, I will be sitting surrounded by the police members.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu engages professionally with Sergeant Tshukudu, sharing information and assisting each other with police work, including tracing wanted suspects.
“... we will sometimes be looking for these Organised Crime syndicates, and those were taxi-related. Now, I will check with them to say, do you not have leads towards these people that we are looking for? And we will share information if they have and if they do not have...”
Brigadier Nkhwashu sometimes asks Sergeant Tshukudu for informal favours such as checking if suspects are in certain areas and arranging their arrests, but does not make formal requests.
“... I may be asking him to check information on the suspect that we are looking for, or I send them the suspect in this particular place ... please see if you can arrest this particular suspect ... I should think those are favours... If I talk to him personally or talk to other colleagues personally, verbally or telephonically, it will be an informal one, which is then a request...”
Brigadier Nkhwashu clarifies that informal requests to Sergeant Tshukudu are not direct commands because Sergeant Tshukudu is not under his direct supervision and would only take instructions from his own commanders.
“If I will be phoning from my work office and request that kind of favour ... it will be a request because he is not serving under my direct supervision and they can only take instructions from the direct lineage command. And if I have to give an instruction ... I will do it in writing and communicating with his or their commanders...”
Brigadier Nkhwashu and others had a conversation about suspects being escorted, involving Sergeant Tshukudu and other members, but he is hesitant to mention names in public due to fear of implication.
“I do not have a problem myself. However, you know, when you start mentioning Madlanga Commission, no one will want this name to be mentioned because people have a fear of being implicated...”
Brigadier Nkhwashu confirms the presence of Sergeant Tshukudu and others during conversations about escorting suspects, and confirms those others were from his jurisdiction.
“... this conversation was had in the presence of Sergeant Tshukudu and others... No, you are quite correct, Advocate.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu states that colleagues and friends accompanied Sergeant Tshukudu, including Warrant Officer Rikhotso and Lt-Col Khalo, but they were not the ones escorting suspects to the jurisdiction.
“Among them, I remember there is Warrant Officer Rikhotso, and there is Lt-Col Khalo ... Those were the people that we often meet in the stokvel, and they were there in that stokvel.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu recalls a conversation involving bail for an unnamed friend overheard by Warrant Officer Vhelaphi, whom he identifies as Rikhotso.
“I recall my earlier conversation with Katiso in which he had asked about bail to an unnamed friend ... As I have understood you, it was Warrant Officer Vhelaphi that I can recall off heart.”
Warrant Officer Rikhotso and Lt-Col Khalo were present at the stokvel with Sergeant Tshukudu, they were not escorting suspects but were present during the conversations.
“So it was Warrant Officer Rikhotso and Lt-Col Khalo as well as Sergeant Tshukudu at the stokvel, yes.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu was triggered to recall a conversation with Mr Molefe regarding bail because police officer Michael Tau was involved as a suspect being escorted.
“What triggered my recollection about that is when they said we were escorting this suspect where specifically this police officer, Michael Tau, is involved and is one of the suspects.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu confirms his involvement in the coordination started early after a shooting incident involving Armand Swart.
“When the shooting of Armand Swart took place, the members, including the colonel that I spoke about, attended the crime scene. And as an Acting District Commissioner, they had to report to me that incident because it is a serious incident.”
Michael Pule Tau was arrested and escorted for a bail application in Brigadier Nkhwashu's jurisdiction.
“He was escorting him and the others to the court for bail application ... obviously, it triggered my mind to say, this is the only case that they can, and this is of a serious nature, and it is a police officer.”
Gauteng Organized Crime was called in by Brigadier Nkhwashu by instruction after the shooting incident to assist in the arrest process in a joint operation.
“It was my instruction. Exactly, Advocate. After the incident, yes, Advocate. So, you coordinated – after the incident, you coordinated the arrest of the suspect. It was a joint operation, and you issued the instruction for Gauteng Organised Crime to be called in.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu acknowledged his brother-in-law recently asked him whether the state was going to oppose bail in a certain case, linking this to a conversation involving Mr Molefe.
“you then say to them, my brother-in-law asked me whether the state is going to oppose bail, right?”
Brigadier Nkhwashu expressed discomfort with Mr Molefe approaching him about job opportunities and bail issues linked to his brother-in-law.
“you confirmed to Commissioner Baloyi that ultimately you thought this was the nub of Mr Molefe's meeting with you... you were also uncomfortable with this.”
Commissioner Baloyi pointed out that Brigadier Nkhwashu's account of meeting Mr Molefe was incomplete without knowing the identity of the person arrested and case details, indicating a missing link in the narrative.
“It has to be that when Mr Molefe met with you, he did mention who the person was, what the case was about... Otherwise this account has got holes... There is something that is missing in your account, especially of the discussion with Mr Molefe.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu raised the issue of his brother-in-law asking about bail during a discussion with officers escorting suspects, not because he intended to discuss it but it came to his mind passively.
“I just quickly touched on it. It just came to my mind during that time... I did not think twice about it, as to whether I should talk about it or not, but I just quickly touched on it.”
Commissioner Baloyi emphasizes the importance that Michael Tau was specifically mentioned in conversations linking Mr Molefe and Brigadier Nkhwashu, or the context does not make sense.
“Michael Tau... you do not get triggered in a vacuum... Otherwise this account has got holes...”
Commissioner Baloyi struggles to understand Brigadier Nkhwashu's account connecting Michael Tau and Mr Molefe without explicit linking details, making the narrative incomplete.
“I am struggling with the account... How you get to connect the two...”
Brigadier Nkhwashu acknowledges the puzzle of how Michael Pule Tau, a friend of Mr Molefe and involved in the Armand Swart case, was arrested and why his name came up in discussions relating to bail and job opportunities.
“This friend of mine... happened to be Michael Pule Tau... arrested with Katiso... really agree with you the way you perceive it.”
Commissioner Baloyi highlights missing specifics about the arrested suspect being a police officer and the relation to the Armand Swart case as gaps in Brigadier Nkhwashu's account.
“if he does not mention a connection to Molefe, who is your brother-in-law, or if he does not say the suspect is connected to Molefe, or that it has to do with the Armand Swart case...there is just missing information that makes your account incomplete.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu discussed a murder case in Vereeniging involving a police officer arrested in that case and stated the investigating officer is Witness B.
“Brigadier Nkhwashu mentioned of a murder case that happened in Vereeniging, and the case is with our unit...the investigating officer of the case is Witness B”
Brigadier Nkhwashu stated that Witness B opposed bail for the accused person Pule Tau, and that his brother-in-law was willing to pay the bail.
“Witness B informed me that she was opposing bail. I then returned and informed Brigadier Nkhwashu that the state is opposing bail... Brigadier Nkhwashu's brother-in-law was willing to pay the bail for the accused person, Pule Tau.”
There are marked differences between Brigadier Nkhwashu's statement and the other person's description of events concerning what was communicated about the bail and case details.
“there is a number of marked differences between the version that you have put down in your statement and his description of what happens. Correct? ... Correct, Advocate.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu partially denies some of the differences claimed regarding his communication about the bail but admits he did not mention his brother-in-law's name and discussed the case via WhatsApp group.
“I will partially not accept that... I have not mentioned the name of my brother-in-law... I told him that I know of the case. In one of our SAPS WhatsApp groups, there was an article regarding that case... a police officer was arrested.”
Sergeant Tshukudu's statement mentions that Brigadier Nkhwashu raised the issue of the Vereeniging murder investigation, which Brigadier Nkhwashu denies.
“Sergeant Tshukudu says you are the one that raised the issue related to the Vereeniging murder investigation. Can you see that? ... Yes, Advocate. ... I deny that you were the first one.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu knew the murder case was in the Provincial Organised Crime unit because he authorised transfer of the docket there after the scene was finalised.
“I knew this because when the scene was finalised, they requested this office, which is Organised Crime, requested the docket... I authorised the transfer of the docket to the same unit.”
Sergeant Tshukudu claims Brigadier Nkhwashu knew about the case from SAPS WhatsApp groups, a claim Brigadier Nkhwashu denies.
“Sergeant Tshukudu says he knows about this case because it was reported in one of the SAPS WhatsApp groups. Do you recall him saying this to you? ... I do not recall... I deny it flatly.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu says the conversation at the drinking place was informal and that Sergeant Tshukudu was not part of the escorting team but his colleagues were, who started the conversation about the case.
“this conversation was not of a formal nature... I have learned that Sergeant Tshukudu was not part of the escorting team, but Warrant Officer Rikhotso and them... they were part and started this conversation...”
Commissioner Baloyi suggests discounting Sergeant Tshukudu as a reliable source about coming to Brigadier Nkhwashu's jurisdiction because he was not part of the escorting team.
“Can we then discount Sergeant Tshukudu as one of the people that said to you or to the group with which you were that they had come to your jurisdiction? Can we discount him? ... I agree, Commissioner.”
A major difference exists between Sergeant Tshukudu's statement and Brigadier Nkhwashu's regarding when the conversation about bail occurred relative to when Tau was escorted.
“To me, a major difference, and this is a material difference between Sergeant Tshukudu's statement and your statement, is that in paragraph 3 of Sergeant Tshukudu's statement, this conversation happened before Tau was escorted to his bail hearing.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu disputes Sergeant Tshukudu's version that the docket left without an investigating officer; Brigadier Nkhwashu did not know who the investigating officer was and wouldn't have told Sergeant Tshukudu.
“for me it does not make sense that the docket left my district without an investigating officer. How had I known that this docket is assigned to this investigating officer ?”
Brigadier Nkhwashu met Witness B on his return to work and discussed the Vereeniging murder case, confirming he already knew about the case.
“I then told Brigadier Nkhwashu that when I see Witness B, I will ask her if the state will oppose bail ... I met Witness B and I told her that I saw an article in Vereeniging murder case ... he already knew about this case”
Sergeant Tshukudu says the conversation about bail took place before Tau was escorted for bail, which had not yet happened at that time, creating a major difference in statements with Brigadier Nkhwashu.
“according to him, it is taking place before Tau is escorted for his bail ... according to Sergeant Tshukudu, nobody has been escorted for bail ... That is really my focus and this is a major difference ... one of you is not telling the truth.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu insists he is telling the truth about the escort for bail being not the first time and started from arrest to prison and court, not on one day.
“I am telling the truth. ... this escort which was made that we were talking to was not for the first time ... the escort started from the time when they were arrested and they were escorted to my area and then to court ... they did not go on one day for the bail application.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu says the conversation about bail was not started by him and during the conversation, Sergeant Tshukudu acknowledged using Brigadier Nkhwashu's state vehicle.
“the day we met, definitely I want to say that this conversation was not started by me ... during the conversation, he acknowledged Sergeant Tshukudu that yes, they were using my state vehicle.”
Between June 2024 and the discussion with Sergeant Tshukudu, there were more than two escorts of Officer Tau arranged by Brigadier Nkhwashu's TRT (Technical Response Team).
“it was more than two escorts because I was the one who was arranging the TRT, the Technical Response Team, to accompany them ... it happened more than two times.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu confirms he did not check the docket system since it was placed with Gauteng Organised Crime and did not know who the investigating officer was.
“since the docket was placed with Gauteng Organised Crime, you have never checked the system ... I never checked the system ... I did not know, and I had no reason.”
Although the docket has been transferred to the Organised Crime Unit, it still remains the responsibility (docket) of Brigadier Nkhwashu's station (Vereeniging), allowing him certain system access and accountability.
“the docket... remains the station of origin... the accountability of the commanders in Vereeniging... it remains your docket”
Brigadier Nkhwashu states that while he can log into the system to see docket status updates, he cannot access the real contents of the investigation or attached statements.
“You will be able to see the status update... But the real contents of the investigation, you will never be able to access”
Brigadier Nkhwashu explains that once a complaint file is opened at his station, he can assign an investigating officer and follow up on progress, even if the docket is investigated outside his station.
“When you open a file... you assign an investigating officer and say to the investigating officer of the complaint now... The investigating officer... will go to the investigating officer concerned and ask that particular investigating officer why you are not giving progress to the complainant”
Brigadier Nkhwashu confirms that the transfer of the docket to Organised Crime Unit does not preclude him from phoning or asking about the investigating officer or the status of the matter.
“Does it mean you are precluded in the way things work? Are you precluded from asking who is the investigating officer in this matter... ? No, not precluded”
Brigadier Nkhwashu admits he informed Sergeant Tshukudu that his brother-in-law knows the arrested person and wants to know if the state would oppose bail.
“you informed Sergeant Tshukudu that your brother-in-law... knows the arrested person and wants to know if the state would oppose bail”
Chairperson warns that an investigating officer not opposing bail due to influence could improperly affect the decision to grant bail.
“if an investigating officer, whether on their own or as a result of influence by others, decide not to oppose bail, that may go a long way towards influencing the decision to be one that actually grants bail when it ought not to have been”
Brigadier Nkhwashu denies telling Sergeant Tshukudu or Witness B that his brother-in-law wanted to know if the state is opposing bail, or the bail amount and willingness to pay bail.
“I deny... that your brother-in-law wanted to know if the state is opposing bail or how much would be the bail and further, that your brother-in-law was willing to pay the bail of the accused”
Chairperson explains the presiding officer relies on information from the investigating officer or witness testimony and affidavits to decide on bail.
“what is usually placed before the investigating officer are either affidavits or testimony in the witness stand... that assists the Presiding Officer to decide whether to grant or refuse bail”
Brigadier Nkhwashu agrees with Chairperson's view about the bail process but says he cannot be certain if an investigating officer could be influenced, and he personally would not ask about bail amounts as it does not suit his profile.
“I will be out of my mind in the absence of the relevant term... to suggest the investigating officer will know, even if she could have an influence towards the granting of bail... But to an extent that I go and say go and ask how much will be the bail is really unforeseen of a person at my level, Commissioner. It does not suit my profile”
The police and specifically the investigating officer are relevant to the question of bail as they get to express a view on bail but do not make the decision; the decision is for the court or presiding officer.
“the investigating officer gets to express a view on bail. They do not make the decision, but they do get to express a view. And the way you have been dealing with this question since you started testifying is you are creating the impression that the police and investigating officers in particular are irrelevant to the question.”
Because the offense is a schedule 6 offense and very serious, the investigating officer cannot be asked not to oppose bail.
“Secondly, this is a schedule 6 offence, Commissioner. You cannot start having to, I mean, ask an investigating officer not to oppose bail because it is a schedule 6 offence. It is a very serious offence.”
The investigating officer can have influence in assisting the granting of bail, but would have known if intending to assist family in bail because they would have informed from the onset.
“the investigating officer can have an influence, can have a way to be assisting in the granting of the bail and so forth. However, Commissioner, I would have known if I intended to assist my brother-in-law with this bail. I would have told him from the onset that even if bail is not going to be opposed, we will not be in a position to know when the bail is granted, how much will it be.”
Corrupt police officials can manipulate the bail process by not opposing bail when they should.
“a corrupt police official could do that. I am not saying that you are. I am not saying that you are, but you appear to be proceeding from the premise that there are no corrupt police officers out there who could do something like that... they would not oppose bail when they ought to.”
Brigadier Nkhuwashu denies being a corrupt police officer and says he would never manipulate bail process; if he wanted to, he would approach the magistrate directly, not manipulate police processes.
“I am not a corrupt officer and I would never do that. And Commissioner, if I wanted to do that, I would have rather approached the Magistrate handling that case...”
Brigadier Nkhuwashu denies knowing that his brother-in-law was willing to pay bail for the accused prior to the information being shared by Mr Molefe.
“I also want to know, how did he know that my brother-in-law is willing to pay that bail equally to how much is going to be affixed?...I also want to know, Commissioner.”
Brigadier Nkhuwashu agrees there are corrupt police officers who use any means to get their way but says that is too low for him as an experienced cop.
“I do accept there are corrupt police officers who will use any means and ways to get it their way, but not an experienced cop like me, doing it that way. That was too low for me.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu describes a mutual exchange of favours with Sergeant Tshukudu and acknowledges a close personal and professional relationship, including familial connection as brother-in-law.
“he is my long-time friend ... he is my brother-in-law, but I stopped him in his tracks ... I am doing him favours, be it official or otherwise, and he is doing me favours”
Brigadier Nkhwashu admits he may not have been sufficiently assertive in expressing reluctance to engage in matters beyond his remit, which could have led Sergeant Tshukudu to assume he could act on his behalf.
Brigadier Nkhwashu denies giving Sergeant Tshukudu a direct instruction to inquire about bail matters, but admits there was a discussion about the brother-in-law wanting to know if the state would oppose bail.
“I do not think I could have gone so far ... to say I instruct you to go and do this and this and this”
Advocate Pooe suggests it is probable that Brigadier Nkhwashu discussed more with Mr Molefe about the bail matter than he has revealed, likely involving requesting or hinting to Sergeant Tshukudu to get information from Witness B.
“it is more probable that you discussed far more with Mr Molefe about this matter than you care to tell us”
It is probable that Brigadier Nkhwashu told Sergeant Tshukudu that his brother-in-law wanted information about whether the state would oppose bail for an arrested person, leading Sgt Tshukudu to seek that information from Witness B independently.
“if you told or asked or hinted to Sergeant Tshukudu to get information about the bail proceedings from Witness B... it is no" always true that we would only attain that information by checking your record”
Sergeant Tshukudu made an inquiry about bail proceedings from Witness B on behalf of Brigadier Nkhwashu's brother-in-law, despite Brigadier Nkhwashu's stated reluctance to involve others in his work or discuss his cases.
“Sgt Tshukudu would still have gone ahead and made this enquiry from Witness B”
Brigadier Nkhwashu acknowledges that Sergeant Tshukudu might have been trying to do him a favour, potentially overstepping boundaries of discussion about cases.
“he could have done that by thinking that he is doing me a favour”
Brigadier Nkhwashu confirms it is likely he discussed bail with Mr Molefe more extensively than publicly acknowledged and had a social conversation which may have been misunderstood.
“I do not deny 100% that I could have said more to what is captured but I really do not remember”
Brigadier Nkhwashu says he had a sequence of conversations with Sergeant Tshukudu before and after the bail was opposed and granted regarding Warrant Officer Tau, indicating different feedback at different stages.
“During those sequence of events, Tshukudu is alleging that he came and updated me. And now, the first update was that, according to Tshukudu, Witness B said she is not able to assist me or my brother-in-law in not opposing bail.”
Witness B said she would oppose bail (as per last sentence of paragraph 4), but this feedback was before the magistrate hearing; after bail was granted, Witness B reacted to the gratitude expressed by the family.
“The first update is the last sentence of paragraph 4, where Tshukudu comes back and says the state is opposing bail... Witness B reacts to the gratitude being extended to her, that thank you for ensuring that Tau got bail. Witness B then says I had nothing to do with it. That was the decision of the Magistrate.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu acknowledges that bail was opposed at the first court appearance as it was a Schedule 6 offence, and he knew this fact.
“So in the first appearance , obviously it is a schedule 6 offence. The bail was opposed. The bail should be opposed and it was opposed, and definitely I know that.”
The new bail application in late June included new facts related to Mr Tau's diabetic condition, constituting new exceptional circumstances requiring new opposition if necessary.
“This was a new bail application on new facts. And if I remember correctly, it had to do with Mr Tau's diabetic condition, and those were then new facts that were going to be placed before the court to say, these are now new exceptional circumstances.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu understands that a message of gratitude from a senior officer to a junior officer in the bail context could come across as a threat.
“And even though you say you did not, you understand why if such a message were to be delivered it would come across as a threat.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu told a group including Sergeant Tshukudu that he does not discuss work issues with his brother-in-law and that if they want to help, they can do so.
“When you were dealing with paragraph 30 of your statement and you were talking about the general response when you told the group that included Sergeant Tshukudu that you did not, you told your brother-in-law that you do not discuss work issues. But if anyone of you wants to help, you can do so.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu would fault Sergeant Tshukudu for taking forward a plight only if it involved carrying out instructions from a social gathering but would not blame him for helping a friend.
“I would fault him on the basis of, I will go back to the two faults, on the basis of him having to carry out a request or instruction from a social gathering and on the other fault, I will not blame him for thinking that he is helping a friend.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu denies having the intention to convey to Captain Tshukudu that a family conversation was of interest to Sergeant Tshukudu and states that repeating the conversation to Captain Tshukudu suggests a desire to have the message conveyed to Witness B but denies the intent behind it.
“I deny. I never had that intention. I cannot blame you for thinking that way, Commissioner. I am not suggesting that that is in fact the position, so that you understand. I agree. It is a probability.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu suggests the explanation for Sergeant Tshukudu making up a story about the conversation with his brother-in-law is that he was doing a friend a favour.
“I would not really think of the reason why he would be doing that, except what I said earlier on that the probability could be that he was doing a friend a favour.”
Ms Cynthia Pulane Gopane is known to Brigadier Nkhwashu and is described as Brigadier and Provincial Component Head of Organised Crime, supervising investigators in the case including Sergeant Tshukudu.
“I know her. Onto that statement is written that Cynthia Pulane Gopane. So I am familiar with her.”
Brigadier Gopane reprimanded Sergeant Tshukudu for some behavior; Tshukudu apologized and said he would stop the behavior.
“Brigadier Gopane says she called Sergeant Tshukudu to reprimand him. The member agreed and said he did not know and was just sent by the Brigadier. He further apologised and he said he would stop this behaviour”
Detectives in the case were surprised by being approached on Brigadier Nkhwashu's instruction to enquire about Mr Tau's bail and were instructed to keep the matter confidential, only discussing it with Provincial Commissioner Maj-Gen Khumalo and Ms Gopane.
“She informed them members that this was a sensitive case and they were not to talk about it to anyone except for herself and the Deputy Provincial Commissioner, Maj-Gen Khumalo.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu never made a demand for the Armand Swart murder docket; he was acting on instruction to collect all dockets with J51s of arrest and submit them to Maj-Gen Mbuso Khumalo.
“Brigadier, you mentioned there that you never made a demand for the docket. Instead, at the time, you were acting on instruction from the Provincial Commissioner to collect all dockets that had J51s of arrest and submit them to the Deputy Provincial Commissioner, Crime Detection, Maj-Gen Mbuso Khumalo”
An email was sent to all the districts explaining the request for copies of J50 warrants of arrest related to the Premier's Wanted Suspects Project, with Brigadier Nkhwashu as a recipient.
“So if you have regards to the bottom of page 27, you will see there all of the district people that were contacted. Can you see that ? ... And you will see on page 28 that you are one of the recipients ... its says request for copies of J 50 warrants of arrest , Premier's Wanted Persons Project ...”
The directive was that all provincial and section commanders must submit copies of J50 warrants of arrest to a central room for the Premier's Wanted Suspects Project.
“By directives of DPCCrime Detection, all provincial commanders and section commanders must submit copies of the J 50 warrants of arrest to that room ...”
Brigadier Nkhwashu explains that a J50 warrant of arrest is attached to a docket and cannot be removed from it; the docket contains details about investigation activities and reasons why a suspect is not arrested yet.
“When an instruction of this nature is issued, we all know that the warrant of arrest, which is a J 50 , is attached to a docket ... In the docket there will be a page that contains the contents of the activities done by the investigating officers, such as suspect trace was not found or suspect was never tried for a particular period ... So if you request the warrant of arrest only, you will not be privy to that information ...”
The Premier's Wanted Project is for cases where warrants of arrest have been issued for suspects who are wanted and not yet arrested; dockets are sent to the Deputy Provincial Commissioner for perusal to understand investigation status.
“This project, I understood it to be for all those cases where warrants of arrest were issued for particular suspects who are wanted and are not arrested as yet ... when you send the docket to the Deputy Provincial Commissioner, they will need to peruse the docket and acquaint themselves with what is happening in the investigation of the case”
Major-General Khumalo was supposed to perform an oversight function reviewing 421 dockets relating to investigations, which would have taken quite some time even with assistance.
“the oversight function which you say was to be conducted by Maj-Gen Khumalo... the dockets are listed at page 28... there were 421 of them... it would have taken quite some time”
Investigators would not have access to dockets physically held by General Khumalo, potentially delaying investigations.
“during that time, if all dockets have physically been taken to the General, that means the investigators involved... would have no access to them and would not be able to conduct investigations on them”
Brigadier Nkhwashu explains that a task team usually has several investigating officers assigned to dockets and may reassign dockets after assessing progress, implying that oversight by General Khumalo would not halt all other investigations.
“usually when a task team is formed to give attention to these cases, they have a number of investigating officers... they may return the docket with instructions... it does not take time on other matters”
An email discussed requests "copies of J50 warrants of arrest" from provincial and section commanders per directives of the Director of Public Prosecutions Crime Detection department, which Chairperson reads as asking for warrants of arrest, not full dockets.
“By directives of the DPC, Crime Detection, all provincial commanders and section commanders must submit 'copies of the J50'... all that this is asking for are warrants of arrest”
Brigadier Nkhwashu agrees the email requests copies of the warrant of arrest, but argues normally full dockets with warrants are also sent and dockets returned after copies requested.
“we always send dockets... even though the subject matter would be saying copies of the J50 warrant of arrest... we never sent these dockets when the copies were requested and the dockets were returned and they said they only needed the copies”
Brigadier Nkhwashu acknowledges the warrant of arrest copies requested by email but says investigations typically continue based on dockets plus warrants and assignments within task teams; thus reading the email as requesting full dockets is a misunderstanding.
“I understand what you are saying and... the email was talking to the copies of the warrant of arrest... however, we normally send the dockets with the warrant of arrest... when a task team is established... they reassigned the docket to task team members”
Brigadier Nkhwashu states that by March 2025 he was personally involved in the docket process despite his brother-in-law being a suspect in the related case, because at that time the brother-in-law was not a suspect and the J50 warrant of arrest related to his nephew.
“why do you still involve yourself... knowing very well that the suspect in this case is your brother-in-law?... my brother-in-law was not a suspect in that case... the J50 warrant of arrest was for... his nephew”
Brigadier Nkhwashu was not aware at the time of instructions that the docket related specifically to Katisho Molefe's murder case, and only realized this after some conversations, leading to his recusal from the matter.
“I was not aware, Commissioner, that this docket is the docket pertaining to Katisho Molefe ... after the first conversation, I realised thereafter that ... this case is talking to the Molefe ... then I started to realise, then I recused myself.”
Copies of dockets were requested and distributed by Brigadier Nkhwashu after instructions from the province, but he did not know the specific case numbers or the details of the dockets at the time.
“I did not know the case number by heart. And when this list of dockets were sent, I just saw a list of dockets and I started distributing instructions to the immediate commanders ...”
Advocate Khumalo challenges the credibility of Brigadier Nkhwashu's claim of ignorance about the docket's association with Molefe's murder, suggesting Nkhwashu should have known since 2024 due to docket transfers and suspect arrests.
“I find that difficult to believe because you knew in 2024 already that a murder docket from Sedibeng had been transferred to Organised Crime and that some of the suspects had not been arrested ... You must have known which docket you were looking for.”
A conversation between Warrant Officer Mills and Witness B on 8 April 2025 involved a request to obtain a copy or a picture of the J50 warrant, with Mills responding with a bowing picture.
“It is a conversation between Warrant Officer Mills and Witness B. I will say the black with the slight shading, that is the text from Warrant Officer Mills, who we have been told is in Maj-Gen Mbuso Khumalo's office. He then reached out to Witness B to obtain a copy or a picture of the J50. This was done on the 8th of April ...”
Witness B complied with the request for a copy of the J50 warrant by 8 April 2025, and Brigadier Nkhwashu reached out to Col Grundling on 16 April 2025 regarding the submission and docket matters.
“So Witness B complying with the request for a copy ... this was done by the 8th of April 2025 ... you then give, you reach out to, was it Colonel Grundling on the 16th of April ... received a request from you on the 16th of April 2025.”
The document specifying dockets to be collected was addressed to Lt-Col Prowse and copied to Col Bezuidenhout of SAPS, with Lt-Col Prowse reporting to Col Bezuidenhout.
“It says it has a name there with a cell phone number ... addressed to – at the bottom it says Attention Lt-Col Prowse. And then at the bottom, it is a Colonel Bezuidenhout ... Col Bezuidenhout is senior to Lt-Col Prowse ... Prowse reporting to Colonel Bezuidenhout.”
Maj-Gen Mbuso Khumalo provided ongoing oversight of the investigation docket related to Mr. Tau from around 20 August 2024, including safety guidance and arranging meetings with investigative teams.
“... after Tau was granted bail, the detectives sought assistance from Maj-Gen Mbuso Khumalo, and ... then met with Maj-Gen Khumalo who provided him with a detailed account of the investigation ...”
Despite Witness B already providing copies and the docket being overseen provincially, Brigadier Nkhwashu still tried to get the docket on 16 April 2025, raising questions about the necessity of this request.
“The fact that Witness B had already provided the copy, moreover, the docket was already being overseen at the provincial office.”
Brigadier N Kwashu was not aware at the time that the investigation officer (IO) had already submitted the warrant of arrest on 8 April, which is why he was still asking for the docket.
“I was not aware at that stage that the IO has already submitted this warrant of arrest, which is why I was saying to Commissioner Khumalo ... Little did I know that it has been submitted”
The Provincial Commissioner made a follow-up on dockets and the docket list received on 14 April included the docket in question.
“on the 14th of April the Provincial Commissioner made a follow-up upon those dockets and the list that I received on the 14th, it has got that docket in that list”
An email from Lt-Col Prowse required the submission of copies of warrants of arrest by 28 March 2025, but the WhatsApp request for the docket was made later on 16 April 2025, past the deadline.
“the email at page 28 from Lt - Col - Prowse . It gives a deadline for submitting these copies of warrants of arrest . It says the 28th of March 2025 . And yet , your request your WhatsApp to Grundling is on the 16th of April . So , it is past the deadline”
The instruction received on 14 April was to provide only 12 dockets, suggesting 11 had already been submitted to the Province.
“the instruction that we received on the 14th of April was ... only having attachment of only 12 dockets , suggesting that already has been submitted to the province”
The Provincial Commissioner issued an internal correspondence to the five District Commissioners in Gauteng requesting a list of wanted suspects to be purified, including checking their status (on the run, arrested, other cases or deceased).
“Provincial Commissioner ... issued an internal correspondence to the five District Commissioners within the Gauteng Province ... requesting for the list of wanted suspects to be purified . Whether they are still on the run , arrested , or other cases or deceased”
Witness Bis is the investigating officer in an Organised Crime docket involving Pule Tau, who was arrested in April, which was already widely known in the town by the time of the call to Brigadier Nkhwashu.
“When I look at the case, it happened in April, and already the case of April, where Pule Tau was arrested, it was all over. It was now the talk of the town. By now, I know that Witness Bis the investigating officer of this case.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu was informed by an informer in Crime Intelligence that his name was being mentioned in connection with the Katiso/Tau matter around Dec-Feb period, but he did not investigate or verify this information.
“My informer happened to be an informer of crime intelligence that I know for a fact. Now, when he told me, he said, I overheard those people at the crime intelligence saying that you are under investigation on the Katiso matter.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu accepted that he did not recuse himself from instructing on dockets related to the Katiso/Tau matter even after learning about the investigation in Feb.
“I knew the case number by then ... by February ... after that, going to March and April, the case number I knew. ... When I saw that list in the spreadsheet, I did not go case by case to check the case numbers.”
Brigadier Nkwashu acknowledges that keeping grudges over a long time does not assist him and that he cannot dispose of or wish away a person like Fundiswa, emphasizing persons are not disposable.
“I am the elder in my family. And as I grow and mature, I realise that keeping grudges for that long is not really assisting me, even myself. And, however, Commissioner, you will know that there is no dustbin for people. And you do not choose to be in the family or in a family relationship. And I cannot dispose, even if I might not have forgiven, but I cannot wish her away. I cannot dispose of a person. Persons are not disposable.”
Brigadier Nkwashu admits that he has not spoken with Fundiswa many times since 2005 and does not have the dates of those interactions.
“Since 2005, I have submitted that I have not spoken to Fundiswa many times. However, Commissioner, I have also submitted that I just do not have the dates with me.”
Brigadier Nkwashu felt uncomfortable after meeting Mr Molefe in June 2024 and believed the meeting was orchestrated specifically for Mr Molefe to discuss a request he made at the end of the meeting, involving using potential work opportunities to entice him.
“You were uncomfortable. And in fact, you say you had the sense that the meeting was orchestrated specifically for him to talk about that request that he made at the end. And in particular that he was using the work opportunities, potential work opportunities, as a way of enticing you.”
Brigadier Nkwashu conveyed to Ms Nyangule his discomfort about the request after the stokvel meeting in July 2024.
“You testified that when asked, did you convey this to Ms Nyangule, you said that you did express it, but you expressed it after the stokvel. The stokvel would have been in July 2024.”
Brigadier Nkwashu and Fundiswa also met with Katiso at Fundiswa's house in Fourways before Katiso's arrest; during which Brigadier Nkwashu conveyed to Fundiswa concerns about being sold out when she asked why he was asked to meet Fundiswa's husband.
“After that meeting where we parted ways, after I said I do not discuss work cases, I believe we have met with Katiso before his arrest. And that could not be correct that I met him once. ... We met at their house in Fourways, which is Fundiswa's house. And also in that weekend, Fundiswa visited with his nephew, and then we met, we sit and dine, and then I asked Fundiswa separately ...”
Brigadier Nkwashu states that Katiso assured him it would not be possible to put him under the bus or to sell him out and that he had missed Fundiswa for quite some time and continued to take care of her needs.
“No, no, no, that cannot be the case. I would not have wanted you to meet my husband, and at the same time set you under the bus, me and you having missed each other for so long. ... I do not believe I did not know what you say you discussed with Katiso. ... I will say, yes, I forgive.”
Brigadier Nkwashu did not meet Mr Molefe only once before his arrest but recalls about three interactions with him prior to arrest, including meetings, but no telephone conversations.
“What I can recall, Commissioner, is that I met him, I think, perhaps I can recall of three times that I have met him. ... That is before he was arrested. ... No [telephone communications].”
Mr Molefe, who is linked by friendship to an accused police officer charged with a serious crime, had discussions with Brigadier Nkwashu about a bail issue and a security job.
“a man who is linked, even if it is just by friendship, is linked to someone who is accused of serious crime... and you have your suspicions about this attempt to, his discussion with you about a security job.”
Brigadier Nkwashu initially thought the security job offer from Katiso was a genuine attempt to close matters, but had suspicions it might be a lure.
“by him wanting to pursue me to carry on with the deal of these security, he was trying to be a good man and trying to close... But I never suspected that this is a luring, although it crossed my mind.”
Brigadier Nkwashu learned of Katiso's arrest from Ms Nyangule but was not told the charges initially; eventually he was told Katiso was charged with conspiracy to murder related to Pule Tau's murder.
“When she was telling me that Katiso is arrested... I did not know what he was charged with... your brother-in-law was arrested, he is being charged for conspiracy to murder... This one of Pule Tau.”
Brigadier Nkwashu had suspicions about Mr Molefe's intentions and was told Mr Molefe was charged with conspiracy to murder in relation to the matter he wanted intervention in.
“you know, you have had suspicions of Mr Molefe's intention... he is charged in the same matter he wanted you to intervene in.”
Brigadier Nkwashu did not initially believe Mr Molefe when Mr Molefe told him he was not involved in the conspiracy to murder and that it was a false allegation.
“I am not involved in this matter, it is just a false allegation, do not worry, I will overcome this... No, I never believed him. I will not be believing him anymore this time.”
Brigadier Nkwashu wanted to see Katiso in person to know for himself what he was arrested for and insist on the truth about the charges.
“I wanted Katiso himself to tell me in my eyes, what is he arrested for... I wanted to go look at him in the eyes, and he told me that I did not... He still denied.”
Brigadier Nkwashu could have been influenced by Fundiswa, who guaranteed that the security job negotiation was not a lure.
“And Fundiswa, do you see where you put me? Now, she was saying the same thing... I was overclouded with anger, to say, I want him to tell me in my eyes... and he denied it until the last visit.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu was angry because someone had denied an accusation to their partner and to her, and she wanted to confront him face to face to ask if he really did it.
“I remember I was angry. All that was clouding my mind was to go see him and ask him in his face, tell me, did you really do this?”
The first visit by Brigadier Nkhwashu to the accused was problematic because it involved using her position to arrange after-hours access for food and clothes delivery, which is not typical conduct for someone seeking answers while angry.
“you use your position to contact somebody ... that first visit that you made ... you use your position to contact somebody ... you get to told you can come ... you do arrive there ... That is the first problem I have about that first visit that you made.”
Fundiswa called Brigadier Nkhwashu in February to accompany her to see Katiso, and Nkhwashu's explanation for the second prison visit was seen as unsatisfactory given Molefe's serious criminal charges.
“Fundiswa called you and said, I am coming up ... I am going to see Katiso, so please pick me up and go with me ... why did you not remain in the car ... you are a senior police officer ... Why are you associating with someone accused of such serious crimes?”
Brigadier Nkhwashu admits she was angry over the situation involving Katiso and her sister and wanted to confront Molefe in person, but acknowledges it was not rational and agrees it was problematic conduct.
“I was angry ... I also want him to tell me in my face ... I accept that sitting where you are you will see it the way you see it and I agree that is an oversight in that regard.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu used her rank and position to access the Area Commissioner and the facility after hours to deliver clothes and food, which Fundiswa alone would not have been able to arrange.
“Fundiswa alone would not have been able to call an Area Commissioner ... and all of that ... that is because of your position.”
Brigadier Nkhwashu admits that, by virtue of his rank and position, he uses his connections to call an Area Commissioner, which ordinary people cannot do.
“because of your rank and your position, you have connections and you use those connections by calling an Area Commissioner”
Brigadier Nkhwashu denies misusing his rank to bypass procedures or tell institutions to allow him access against policy.
“if I was using or misusing my position I would have gone to that particular institution and then when they say you cannot see, the policy does not allow you to see Katiso at this time, I would have said no”
On 9 December 2024, Brigadier Nkhwashu called Mr M Khaliphi at 13:24 to ask for permission to bring clothes to his brother-in-law who was arrested and remanded to Groenpunt Prison after appearing in Vereeniging Court.
“On the 9th of December, he received a call from you at about 13:24 to ask for permission to bring clothes to his brother-in-law, who was arrested at an airport the same day, the 9th of December 2024, and appeared at the Vereeniging Court and was remanded to Groenpunt Prison”
Brigadier Nkhwashu acknowledges that Mr Molefe was remanded to Groenpunt Prison after appearing in Vereeniging Court on 9 December and denies informing Mr Khaliphi that Molefe was arrested at the airport that day.
“he was remanded to his prison after the appearance in Vereeniging Court on the 9th... I could not have called and told the Area Commissioner that this brother-in-law of mine is arrested in the airport... I knew that he was arrested on the 6th”
Brigadier Nkhwashu refutes Mr Khaliphi's statement that he called to ask for permission to bring clothes on the arrest day at the airport, stating Molefe was arrested earlier on 6 December at his residence, not at the airport on 9 December.
“that was not true because we know that Mr Molefe was arrested on the 6th at his residence”
Brigadier Nkhwashu explains that a person is not taken immediately to prison after arrest but detained at the police station and charges processed within 48 hours before court appearance and remand to prison.
“when a person is arrested, it is a common knowledge that a person will not be taken straight to the prison. The person will be taken to the police station... and the process of charging that particular person will take place within the 48 hours... then the person will then have to go to court before he can be transferred to a prison”
Brigadier Nkhwashu confirms he told Mr Khaliphi that Mr Molefe appeared at Vereeniging Court that day and was remanded to Groenpunt Prison; this is the important aspect and correct version.
“you told Mr M Khaliphi that Mr Molefe had appeared at Vereeniging Court that day and was remanded, that is the important part, remanded to Groenpunt Prison, you said that”
Brigadier Nkhwashu does not know why Mr Khaliphi would lie about calling to ask permission because of the very specific claim that Molefe was arrested at the airport the same day and appearing in court.
“I do not know actually why would he say that... because you will accept that this is very specific to say arrested at an airport”
Brigadier Nkhwashu admits that his enquiry about Mr Molefe's admission to Groenpunt Prison was standard procedure after the first court appearance and before delivering personal clothing.
“The standard procedure that I know of, when a suspect is arrested and they appear before the jurisdiction, which is now in Vereeniging in this case, they send the awaiting trial prisoners to Leeuw of which is within the jurisdiction of Vereeniging...”
Brigadier Nkhwashu explains that upon remand following first court appearance, awaiting trial prisoners are sent to Leeuw Prison, but Mr Molefe's case was unusual as he was detained at Groenpunt Prison, which surprised all.
“it was different and we were all surprised why he was detained or incarcerated in Groenpunt”
Brigadier Nkhwashu denies deliberately misleading the Commission in paragraph 49 of his statement and says he only inquired about the facility as standard procedure.
“Most definitely it was not deliberately done to mislead you, Commissioners... I was enquiring about... when first appearance suspect appears in court in Vereeniging...”
Brigadier Nkhwashu and Fundiswa knew Mr Molefe was remanded to Groenpunt Prison after court and therefore knew where to deliver clothes and food, contradicting a misleading statement in paragraph 49 of his statement.
“You already knew in the same way that Fundiswa knew where he was and could have taken the food and the clothes to him... Your involvement was not because she does not know where to find him. She knew where he is. You knew where he is.”
Affidavits related to certain events were deposed in January 2025, about a month after the events of December 9, 2024, making their accounts likely more accurate due to recency.
“their affidavits were done four weeks after these events... their account of events is more accurate than yours”
Brigadier Nkwashu asserts Mr Molefe is a liar who cannot tell the truth and lies to his face, and prefers to believe official statements rather than Mr Molefe's.
“Mr Molefe is, according to me, a liar. He cannot tell the truth. And he lied to me in my eyes.”
Mr Molefe may have regarded his relationship with Brigadier Nkwashu as merely a business relationship rather than a familial one, and wanted to use him for purposes related to bail and security matters.
“maybe after all, he had no interest and he never considered you or perceived you as his family and brother-in-law, but in fact as a person that would be useful to him for purposes that we have seen... to help out with the bail issue”
Brigadier Nkwashu received consistent monthly payments in 2025 as part payment for three vehicles he bought by trading in his old vehicles at a dealership.
“I have sold my X5 vehicle to buy another X5 in that dealership. And on the other amount that you see, actually I bought in totality three vehicles in that dealership. So, the monies that you see is for the vehicles that I have sold them ... the money for the trade-ins is being paid to my account every month.”
Brigadier Nkwashu prefers monthly payments for trade-ins instead of lump sum payments to avoid losing money through finance interest, and benefits from charging interest to the dealership on the monthly basis.
“Yes, my understanding is that if you pay on a monthly basis to the account, you are not, when you pay the lumpsum to the finance, you are not, you are losing because they are charging you interest. So, when you get a monthly payment from the dealership, you are also benefiting because you are charging them also the interest.”
The monthly payments were made by agreement with the dealership though it is not a regular practice for the dealership to pay trade-in amounts monthly.
“And one thing that we cannot e is in discussions with the dealership, it was mentioned that this was your agreement. You insisted on monthly payments. This is not something that they regularly do. Do you have a comment on that? ... I agree, yes.”
The values paid for the vehicles as trade-ins correspond exactly to the declared values to SAPS and to the amounts stated in the spreadsheet under scrutiny.
“And just lastly, if we are to check the values that are being paid for these cars as against the values that you have also declared to SAPS, it would be the same? It would be the same, Advocate.”
Brigadier Nkwashu apologized to the family of Armand Swart for the loss of life caused by his brother-in-law and stated the brother-in-law must pay for his deeds.
“I would like to apologise, especially to the family of Armand Swart, whose life has been lost at the hands of this brother-in-law of mine. And say, at least I have tried to do justice, and I will continue to ensure that justice is achieved. If indeed he was involved in the matter of Armand Swart, he needs to pay for his deeds.”
Brigadier Nkwashu apologised to the community for his conduct involving collusion with a person named Katiso whom he did not know well and stated he will no longer engage with Katiso.
“I would like to apologise to the entire community that is watching this embarrassment that is caused by my conduct, by colluding with this Katiso, although I did not know he is this type of a person. And I really feel betrayed and I am definitely, definitely not going to continue having any engagement with this particular guy. And I wish justice would prevail.”