Parliament

The Investigating Director reports to the National Director of Public Prosecutions and Parliament, including appearances when called.

“The Investigating Director in turn reports to the National Director of Public Prosecutions and also to Parliament as and when she is called.”

According to Mr Adams, the documents were slipped under his door at the office in Parliament; he claimed there were no cameras in the corridor and the register of sign-ins was futile due to many people signing in and out.

“He said to me that it was slotted under his door in an envelope. ... Mr Adams' reply was, there is no camera on that, in his corridors where his office is. ... Mr Perumal told me it would be futile because of how many people signed in and out.”

Mr Adams received information about General Madondo's security clearance application from documents pushed under his door in Parliament, which was not lawfully obtained.

“In his affidavit ... he says: “I attach hereto documents which were pushed under my office door at Parliament, and which relate to Madondo's application.””

The Section 27 referral document initiates the intake of a matter and is confidential, only disclosed to the accused if requested, and has not been disclosed to the Defence relevant to IDAC investigations, being the basis for initiating investigations.

“The section 27 is the intake document. According to me, the section 27 referrals are not disclosed unless they are requested by the accused. Now, when I went to Parliament, we had not disclosed this document at all to the accused. We have not disclosed section 27s, the referrals, to the Defence because it is the basis on which we initiate our investigations.”

Mr Adams suspected General Khumalo and others due to finding an envelope pushed under his office door at Parliament containing Crime Intelligence procurement and vetting documents using secret funds.

“My suspicion about General Khumalo and others became more clearer when I found an envelope pushed under my office door at Parliament which contained some Crime Intelligence procurement documents using secret funds and vetting documents.”

Advocate Johnson received information from time to time that led to suspicion about misuse of secret funds and vetting documents pushed under his door at Parliament related to Crime Intelligence procurement.

“he then says in paragraph 3 that that suspicion became even clearer when an envelope pushed under his door at Parliament contained Crime Intelligence procurement documents using secret funds of Crime Intelligence and vetting documents”

Advocate Johnson's suspicion became clearer upon finding an envelope with Crime Intelligence procurement documents using secret funds pushed under his office door at Parliament.

“My suspicion about General Khumalo and others became more clearer when I found an envelope pushed under my office door at Parliament , which contained some Crime Intelligence procurement documents using secret funds of Crime Intelligence and vetting documents.”

An envelope containing Crime Intelligence procurement documents using secret funds and vetting documents was pushed under Mr. Adams' door at Parliament, leading to suspicion regarding General Khumalo and others.

“That suspicion became even clearer when an envelope pushed under his door at Parliament contained Crime Intelligence procurement documents using secret funds of Crime Intelligence and vetting documents.”

Mr. Adams' suspicion became clearer when he found an envelope containing Crime Intelligence procurement documents using secret funds and vetting documents pushed under his office door at Parliament.

“My suspicion about General Khumalo and others became more clearer when I found an envelope pushed under my office door at Parliament, which contained some Crime Intelligence procurement documents using secret funds of Crime Intelligence and vetting documents.”

General Khan coordinated with Mr Malema through Mr Sayed to send questions to the Inspector General in Parliament via the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF).

“General Khan has prepared, which he is going to essentially ask Mr Malema to arrange to be put to the Inspector General in Parliament through the EFF”

Following the media briefing by General Mkhwanazi, an Ad Hoc Committee was established in Parliament to examine the matters discussed.

“Following the media briefing, an Ad Hoc Committee was established in Parliament to examine these matters.”

The witness was not supportive of mentioning General Khan's name at a certain point and indicated embarrassment when it was pushed on them by other Honorable members of Parliament.

“I was not supportive on that day. If you can check the video, I did not even talk much on that day. But the level of embarrassment that was pushed on our name...”

There is an allegation that Feroz Khan is protected and covered up by authorities, including the Parliament.

“Apparently, he is being covered up and protected, even by us. Now they say we are protecting him. We cannot get him here.”

Mr Nku was introduced to a person known as 'IBY' or 'EBY' by his distant relative Mr Kebby Maphatsoe, a former Deputy Minister in Military Veterans between 2014 and 2019, which introduction he regarded as significant and credible at the time.

“I was introduced to a person known to me as IBY or EBY, by my distant relative Mr Kebby Maphatsoe. Mr Maphatsoe was known to me not only as a relative but also as a person who had occupied a public office including serving as a member of Parliament and as Deputy Minister in Military Veterans between 2014 and 2019. The introduction was therefore one that I regarded significant and credible at the time.”

In Parliament on 19 April 2012, General Mkhwanazi refused to reveal the higher authority that instructed him to lift General Mdluli's suspension, only stating he acted according to 'higher authority'.

“he said I acted according to higher authority. And when he was asked what the higher authority was, he declined to say”

FUL alleged that the Acting Commissioner publicly stated in Parliament that he took the decision to withdraw disciplinary charges on instructions from authorities beyond him and thus failed to act independently.

“FUL alleged that the Acting Commissioner publicly stated in Parliament that he took the decision to withdraw the disciplinary charges on instructions from authorities beyond him.”

Mr O'Sullivan denies slipping the investigation dossier under a certain member of Parliament's door and denies that anyone got any dossier from him.

“I am not in the business of jumping on a plane and flying to Cape Town to slide a dossier under anybody's door... I do not send any dossiers... Absolutely did not get any dossier from me.”