All entities
person

Mr Eugene Modise

Referred to as: Mr Bonzo Modise · Mr Eugene Modise

View in network
7 claims
1 hearing days
8 linked entities

Picture

No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.

Most often named alongside

Day 8709 Apr 2026

Open hearing day →
medium
corruption
90% conf.

According to a News24 article, Triotic Protection Services had lucrative security contracts at ANC Madibeng Municipality in the northwest and Lephalale as of February 2023, with Modise as sole director and shareholder until that time.

New News 24 has established that Triotic Protection Services , in which Modise was the sole director and shareholder until February 2023 , has got lucrative security contracts at the ANC Madibeng Municipality in the northwest and Lephalale .
UNATTRIBUTEDDay 87 · 09 Apr 2026Refers to: February 2023Location: ANC Madibeng Municipality and Lephalale
YouTube 2:25:21
unrated
political interference
90% conf.

According to a news article, Mr Modise at the time of the tender award was secretary of the ANC in the Tshwane region since 2018, implying he was in the service of the state at that time.

When the Tshwane Council awarded Triotic , the contract in February 22 , Modise was secretary of the ANC in the Tshwane region , a position he has held since 2018 .
YouTube 2:28:31
unrated
procurement
90% conf.

Director Malatji agrees that if Mr Modise was in the service of the state at the time of the tender award, Triotic should not have been appointed.

If one assumes that , just to follow the caution from Commissioner Baloyi , Mr Modise was in the service of the state , would you agree that , or anyone , for example , who is a director , would you agree that he ought not to - Triotic would not have been appointed ? I agree .
DIRECTOR MALATJIDay 87 · 09 Apr 2026
YouTube 2:31:09
unrated
procurement
85% conf.

There is uncertainty whether Mr Modise was a counsellor or an employee of the state at the time of the tender award in 2022.

was he or was he not a counsellor or an employee of the municipality ? Because if he was not , then as Commissioner Baloyi suggests , it is questionable whether we should be entertaining this line of questioning . Unless it can be put to Director Malatji that he was in fact an employee and therefore he should not have participated in the tender .
YouTube 2:32:15