All entities
other

service provider

Referred to as: service provider · Service provider

View in network
10 claims
7 hearing days
14 linked entities

Picture

No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.

Most often named alongside

Day 9828 Apr 2026

Open hearing day →
unrated
judicial process
90% conf.

By the time the City receives service provider invoices, the contract may no longer be operative, but the invoices relate to a period when the contract was operative.

But by the time the City gets the invoices, that invoice, the contract is no longer operative, but the invoice relates to a period when the contract was operative.
ADV CHASKALSON SCDay 98 · 28 Apr 2026
YouTube 1:47:07

Day 9421 Apr 2026

Open hearing day →
unrated
judicial process
95% conf.

Mr M N Isi conceded Sergeant Nkosi was involved but stated no completely sensitive or confidential information was shared in the payment process relating to the termination letter which had already been sent to the service provider.

I did concede that Sergeant Nkosi involved himself . ... there was nothing completely sensitive or confidential within the payment process ... In terms of this termination letter , it had already gone out to the service provider
YouTube 4:43:31
unrated
judicial process
85% conf.

Mr Mnisi asserted that the termination letter was related to the issue of outstanding payables and is a major issue impacting the service provider, requiring all parties to work together for resolution.

it does because it is related. It is a related matter where it is a major issue in the service provider. The service provider could have a deployment letter that we are not aware of. So this must be dealt with accordingly and that all parties involved must work together.
YouTube 5:30:14
unrated
judicial process
90% conf.

According to Advocate Chaskalson SC, the service provider had received a letter stating they may not provide any services effective from 1 July, and there are no deployment letter issues affecting the next financial year.

The service provider has received a letter that says you may not provide any services with effect from 1 July. Next financial year, you may not provide any services. Service provider cannot, there are no issues with deployment letters that might affect the next financial year in the face of that letter.
ADV CHASKALSON SCDay 94 · 21 Apr 2026
YouTube 5:30:38

Day 9320 Apr 2026

Open hearing day →
unrated
judicial process
85% conf.

Mr Mnisi states that once colleagues raise a matter, the onus is on the service provider to take the matter forward and he does not intervene, requesting only feedback as part of resolving matters.

I need to accept that as the status quo, meaning the onus is now on the service provider to take the matter forward. Meaning I am not breaching our processes because I am not actively intervening. I was requesting for feedback, and that is normal in terms of resolving matters.
YouTube 3:30:14
unrated
judicial process
80% conf.

General Dlamini instructed the service provider to go back to Mfowethu, which is problematic because the onus is supposed to be on the service provider to submit necessary documents.

Dlamini says, I have told the service provider to go back Mfowethu. That is a problem I have. That right now you say that the onus is on the service provider, and I accept that. They must submit the necessary documents.
YouTube 3:30:50

Day 9217 Apr 2026

Open hearing day →
unrated
judicial process
90% conf.

Purchase orders in this context are documents issued by the Municipality to service providers detailing required services like security guards, vehicles, and rates, which the service provider then invoices on basis of.

purchase orders to be documents that would go out from the Municipality to a service provider and in this context , the document would say we require the services of security guards at such and such a site and what we require are X number of security guards , X number of vehicles and at the rates , which total X amount over such and such period . And then the service provider would then render these services on that basis and obviously would then invoice
YouTube 4:55:32

Day 8608 Apr 2026

Open hearing day →
unrated
procurement
85% conf.

Service provider was told by Director of Protection Services that Metro Police Cost Centre owner did not want to pay them, and original invoices were not hand-delivered despite requests.

Further to unprofessional conduct, the service provider was told the Metro Police Cost Centre owner does not want to pay them. I am still waiting for the original invoices to be hand-delivered as per the promise of the ladies I spoke to (Winnie and Ulander).
YouTube 4:43:13

Day 8119 Mar 2026

Open hearing day →

Day 7816 Mar 2026

Open hearing day →
medium
police conduct
85% conf.

Sergeant Nkosi forwarded the confidential SAPS audit report to Mr Matlala because he assumed Mr Matlala was entitled to receive it as a service provider.

He is a service provider there... I also assumed at the time, I thought as a service provider, he was also issued with such officially, so I took it on that level.
SERGEANT NKOSIDay 78 · 16 Mar 2026
YouTube 4:24:51