All entities
other

affidavit

Referred to as: affidavit · Affidavit

View in network
8 claims
6 hearing days
14 linked entities

Picture

No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.

Most often named alongside

Day 15304 Aug 2026

Open hearing day →
medium
judicial process
95% conf.

The affidavit prepared for General Khan regarding the Lushaba incident was unsigned, not part of the docket, and was obtained long after the fact, raising concerns about its timing and value.

The affidavit was never signed off. It is not part of the docket ... Why was it not obtained three years ago? Why is it done after the fact?
No timestamp available
YouTube
unrated
judicial process
90% conf.

Despite queries raised about the Lushaba incident, Advocate Serunye was not referring investigators to General Khan to obtain an affidavit; General Khan later sent an affidavit that did not help and was never signed off.

I am querying a number of issues , but nothing about referring them to General Khan . And in his response to me , he came to the affidavit to say some of your queries can be answered by this . But I read it at the time . It was not helping ... it was never signed off and does not form part of the docket .
No timestamp available
YouTube

Day 14928 Jul 2026

Open hearing day →
unrated
judicial process
90% conf.

The affidavit that initiated the investigation and culminates in prosecution related to General Madondo's security clearance was commissioned by Mr Perumal and may contain questionable signatures possibly not belonging to Mr Adams.

...the affidavit that initiates the investigation and culminates in the prosecution, correct? ... both the preamble statement and the affidavit, in respect of which it was suggested to Colonel Padayachee that there seems to be something wrong with the signatures there and that it looks like the signature that purports to be of Mr Adams may not be his. The affidavit is commissioned by Mr Perumal.
YouTube 3:22:34

Day 14623 Jul 2026

Open hearing day →
unrated
judicial process
95% conf.

The affidavit revealed only that a civilian was unduly benefited over employees within Crime Intelligence; this does not justify investigation for serious high profile or complex corruption or commercial or financial crimes.

all that affidavit does is tell you that a civilian was unduly benefited over employees within Crime Intelligence. That is all it tells you.
YouTube 2:58:08

Day 14116 Jul 2026

Open hearing day →

Day 13914 Jul 2026

Open hearing day →
unrated
judicial process
80% conf.

There is a problem with the work process in investigations as the workflow is broken down into different investigations but the relevant team members may not have access to all the affidavits and information, leading to challenges in understanding and completing investigations.

I still maintain that he would have shared this affidavit to give you insight into what the suspicions are and why you are having the investigations, otherwise, there is a team that is just flying blind.
YouTube 5:11:20

Day 13306 Jul 2026

Open hearing day →
unrated
judicial process
90% conf.

The affidavit was commissioned and dated 5 July 2026 and that is the official stamp of the Commissioner of Oaths.

I notice the date of commissioning is 5 July 2026, according to the stamp ... It is dated and stamped by the Commissioner yesterday
C H A I R P E R S O N / ADV HASSIM SCDay 133 · 06 Jul 2026Refers to: 2026-07-05
YouTube 46:25