Referred to as: section 27 affidavit referral · Section 27 affidavit referral · Section 27 affidavit/referral
No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.
MS Ramsamy did not retain possession of the original section 27 affidavit referral nor any copies and returned it to the office the same day after receiving it.
“I wish to state I did not retain possession of the original section 27 affidavit referral, nor any copies thereof. As instructed, I returned the same to your office on the same day after receiving it.”
The Section 27 affidavit/referral stems from a complainant and is not an internal document, thus should be considered with the view to disclosing the founding affidavit as well along with any supplementary affidavits.
“But it is not internal. It is not an internal document. It is a document that comes from a complainant. And so, to categorise it as an internal document, as if it is an internal document, is misleading. And it is a document that seems, if you are going to disclose a supplementary affidavit, then it does not make sense that the founding affidavit would not be disclosed.”
There are multiple separate investigations related to the Section 27 affidavit referral, including the Lushaba matter, the Mokwele matter, and a third investigation involving Lieutenant-General Khumalo and General Madondo.
“There is then a third investigation. That is the one for which the warrants were held over, just for context, in terms of Lieutenant-General Khumalo and General Madondo. And then there are other matters that also emanate from this complaint.”
The first investigation was the General Lushaba matter, followed by the Mokwele matter, then other matters arising from the Section 27 referral.
“Started with the General Lushaba matter. Yes. That is the first matter. The Mokwele matter being ...”
There are six other matters emanating from the Section 27 affidavit referral.
“I know of four … five, six, there would be six. Six other matters.”