No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.
Concern raised that without a DDPP and senior investigator, the junior prosecutor working unsupervised on such a matter involving senior SAPS generals was problematic.
“ADV KHUMALOSC”
Adv Serunye states Advocate Ramsamy was also involved but was off sick that morning and she was not a DDPP.
“ADV SERUNYE and ADV KHUMALOSC”
The matter was proceeding without a DDPP and project owner, implying that even with Advocate Ramsamy assisting, it was still junior prosecutors handling the case, which was a concern due to the involvement of high-level SAPS officials.
“ADV KHUMALOSC”
There was confusion and scramble in the IDA offices in October 2025 about the whereabouts of the section 27 referral affidavit, which was thought missing or destroyed.
“on the 9th of October 2025 it did not exist because in File 10 on page 402 ... There was a scramble at IDA offices because people were looking for the section 27 ... nobody knew where it was ... they actually thought it is missing or it has been destroyed”
The true date of request for the section 27 referral was about 31 October 2025, not days after a management meeting in early September as initially stated.
“your statement is incorrect where you say some days after the management meeting ... it looks like it is a month or two after ... it is actually about 31st of October 2025”