No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.
There was manipulation and lying by a person involved in vetting processes, accepted by others who engaged in the interrogation process.
“persons who ought to have interrogated and or engaged the process and to have picked up during this process that the person had manipulated and or lied”
One person misrepresented information to another in the CAS vetting process, raising a question whether the second person knowingly approved the vetting despite untruths and manipulation.
“one of them misrepresented certain information to the other and the other did whatever they did to approve the vetting”
The dockets from SAPS are now in possession of IDAC, and IDAC is responsible for those dockets, continuing all reporting to the criminal accountability system (CAS).
“on the SAPS system , it will show that the dockets are now in possession of IDAC . And IDAC is responsible for that docket . And all the processes that flow must be still reported to keep the CAS system or criminal system updated .”
If multiple evidence bags are submitted for a single case (CAS), the system assigns the same lab number but different entry numbers for each evidence bag submission under that CAS number.
“If they do their operation and get something that relates to that CAS number, then they will submit it... That one lab number is also linked to the CAS... when they bring the second evidence bag number, the lab number will be the same, but the entry number... will become the second entry.”