All entities
event

tender 3/2425

Referred to as: Tender 3/2425 · tender 3/2425

View in network
4 claims
2 hearing days
6 linked entities

Picture

No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.

Most often named alongside

Day 8424 Mar 2026

Open hearing day →
unrated
procurement
90% conf.

The replacement tender 3/2425 was completed, evaluated, and selected for probity review, which extended far beyond the initial expected 30 days, lasting until mid-October 2025.

This new replacement tender, which is the 3/2425, was then obviously completed and it was evaluated. And in this process, at the end of March, beginning of April, when the BEC concluded its work, this tender was then selected for probity. And probity process then ran its course, which initially was thought it would only be 30 days. It eventually ran up to the middle of October.
COMMISSIONER SPIESDay 84 · 24 Mar 2026Refers to: 2025
YouTube 58:24
medium
procurement
95% conf.

The tender 3/2425 was cancelled due to two reasons found by probity: ambiguous pricing schedule and missing six bid documents causing irregularity, requiring a fresh tender process.

the 3/2425 , must be cancelled because there were two reasons that was given on the report . The one reason – and it comes from probity, what probity found . The one reason was that the pricing schedule that was attached to the tender originally was ambiguous . And the reason for the ambiguity was that the BEC stated that on the pricing schedule there may be no blank spaces ... the second finding was that when the documents was removed from supply chain in the BEC, there was a register where probity signed for all the documents, all the bid documents . However, when they returned it , six documents were missing. And that missing documents then caused the second reason why this tender... be cancelled because of this irregularity
COMMISSIONER SPIESDay 84 · 24 Mar 2026Refers to: 2025
YouTube 59:01

Day 8220 Mar 2026

Open hearing day →
unrated
procurement
90% conf.

The tender 3/2425 was mistakenly referred to as tender 1/2425 by Adv Chaskalson SC during the inquiry.

If you look at the heading on page 980, you will see that it does not relate to tender 1/2425, which was the tender we discussed yesterday. It relates to tender 3/2425.
ADV CHASKALSON SCDay 82 · 20 Mar 2026Refers to: April 30, 2025
YouTube 4:35
unrated
procurement
90% conf.

If you were a bidder for tender 3/2425 like Mr Mampane was, and saw your price would lose, you would have an even bigger incentive to get tender 3/2425 cancelled.

If you were a bidder for tender 3/2425 , like you say Mr Mampane was , and you saw a list of all the bidders and all their prices and you realised that your price was going to lose , you would have an even bigger incentive to get tender 3/2425 cancelled .
ADV CHASKALSON SCDay 82 · 20 Mar 2026
YouTube 57:25