unrated
corruption
85% conf.Advocate Johnson explains that additional statements were taken in a case related to theft of secret or slush funds, which are linked to appointment grievances and charges of gratification.
“They took additional statements... relates to the allegations of the appointment, but that there would have been other statements that would relate to the theft of the funds... that this grievance as it relates to this employee... her ending up being charged...”
ADV JOHNSONDay 146 · 23 Jul 2026