General Chamane

The investigations authorized under section 8(13) by the Investigating Director pertained to all allegations of fraud and corruption as per dockets reviewed, but the initial statements by Mr Adams were considered flimsy and other dockets required additional statements.

“The investigation was authorised by the Investigating Director in terms of section 8(13) of the NPA Act into allegations of fraud and corruption... original dockets by Adams were exactly what General Chamane says. They were flimsy. So they took additional statements”

The six dockets contained only the complainant's A1 statements and no other evidence, and they were too vague and scant to formulate charges against any suspects.

“Onl y the complainant 's A1 statements are contained in the six dockets . No other evidence is contained in the dockets . The lack of location information makes it impossible to determine proper jurisdiction at this stage . The current information contained in the dockets is scanty and too vague to formulate charges against any suspects .”

The initial section 27 referral dockets contained only the complainant's A1 statements and no other evidence, making it impossible to determine proper jurisdiction.

“Onl y the complainant 's A 1 statements are contained in the six dockets . No other evidence is contained in the dockets . ... The current information contained in the dockets is scanty and too vague to formulate charges against any suspects . As a result , Legal Services are unable to confirm that the required elements of any offence are contained in the dockets .”