Referred to as: section 7 · Section 7
No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.
Investigator Rapetsu received the dockets and shared them with Advocate Ramsami who appraised them with section 7 alongside section 27.
“The dockets when they were received , were received by Investigator Rapetsu . Investigator Rapetsu then shared those dockets with Advocate Ramsami , who already had the 27 and she appraised those dockets together with the section 7 .”
Advocate Johnson clarifies the test under section 27 initially described as subjective must be understood as an objective test of the reasonable person applying the test, rejecting mixing subjective and objective tests.
“I said the test under section 7 is subjective ... No answer but then later asserts it is an objective test of the reasonable person.”
Investigations should be based on sufficient and satisfactory affidavits that comply with legal requirements, not just on suspicions or unsubstantiated allegations.
“what you appear to have done is then to dig and get to what you then considered to be the cover-up and the incident. That is not how you should do it. You must understand from the statement what exactly is meant. Section 7 requires an affidavit. Is there enough in the affidavit to satisfy those requirements? You simply cannot just talk”