No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.
The complaint case was registered under Section 28(1)(h) of the IPID Act with approval from the Executive Director or delegate and assigned to the speaker for investigation.
“The case was opened at Booysens Police Station and registered as Booysens CAS 252/10/2021 ... The complaint was referred by Executive Director ... registered as Section 28(1)(h) of IPID Act”
The memorandum seeks approval from the Executive Director or delegate to give IPID permission to investigate cases involving SAPS members, but these cases do not mention Section 28(1)(a) to (g).
“The purpose of this memorandum is to seek approval from the Executive Director or someone delegated by the Executive Director to give IPID permission to investigate these kinds of cases where the SAPS members are involved. But those are not the cases that are mentioned in terms of Section 28(1)(a) to (g).”
There was a failure in escalating a docket request to the Executive Director and General Lebeya at IPID, which hindered further inquiry into the docket.
“the NHl was supposed to have escalated the matter to the Executive Director, of which I do not think the matter was ever escalated.”