No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.
The Commission's expert agrees with Mr Carrim's treating clinician on the matter of independent medical assessment and voluntary versus compelled examination issues.
“the Commission's own expert agrees with and if you look at paragraphs 18 to 19 of Annexure MT1 I think I have given you that already, you will see that there is a synergy between that”
There has been a reply to the Commission's expert's report at paragraph 16 of the replying affidavit on pages 334 to 335, addressing inaccuracies raised about the treating doctor's affidavits and reports.
“You will find that reply at paragraph 16 of the replying affidavit, at pages 334 to 335”
Reply to the Commission's expert's report is found at paragraph 16 of the replying affidavit, pages 334 to 335, specifically paragraphs 17 and 18, addressing inaccuracies raised about the quality of affidavits and reports by the treating doctor.
“You will find that reply at paragraph 16 of the replying affidavit, at pages 334 to 335, which I am not going to read for obvious reasons, except to please point your specific attention to what is said at paragraph 335, at, on page 335 at paragraph 17 and paragraph 18, because with all due respect, several inaccuracies have been raised about the quality of the affidavits and the reports presented by the treating doctor”