client's doctor

Medical evidence from the client's doctor is unchallenged and authoritative, supported by established legal authorities such as the Hyatt case, which states that a committee should not disregard unchallenged medical evidence when deciding on disciplinary processes.

“the point about unchallenged medical evidence and proceeding in the face of unchallenged medical evidence, and you know I say that our, my client's doctor's evidence when properly understood, is unchallenged. ... it says: 'It would be wrong for a committee which has the livelihood and reputation of a professional individual in the palms of its hands to go with a hearing where there is unchallenged medical evidence that the individual is simply not able... to withstand the rigors of the disciplinary process.'”

ADV PREMHID says medical evidence from his client's doctor is unchallenged and supported by legal authorities including the Hyatt case cited.

“the point about unchallenged medical evidence and proceeding in the face of unchallenged medical evidence, and you know I say that our , my client 's doctor 's evidence when properly understood, is unchallenged . That point is made by the same authorities relied on by our learned friends. So for example, at paragraph 16 of the Hyatt case which can be found at pages 6 and 7 of their authority bundles, that point is made .”