The deponent to Mr Carrim's affidavits, who is his wife, does not know who the auditors are and says nobody else knows either.
“the deponent to Mr Carrim's affidavits says, I do not know and she says, nobody else knows.”
No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.
The deponent to Mr Carrim's affidavits, who is his wife, does not know who the auditors are and says nobody else knows either.
“the deponent to Mr Carrim's affidavits says, I do not know and she says, nobody else knows.”
An individual working for Mr Carrim is actually his wife, who screens his calls and emails, liaises with banks, facilitates payments, and directs matters requiring attention.
“if you look at who she works for, it is not Mr Carrim himself, it is the wife ... all she does is she screens my husband's calls and emails, liaises with the banks ... facilitates payment of staff, and directs matters requiring attention to the appropriate person”
The individual working for Mr Carrim plays a supportive role and is not a decision-maker with expansive abilities.
“it is clearly that she plays a supportive role, and so she does not have this as expansive ability as Chair is perhaps suggesting”
It is implausible that Mr Carrim's wife would not know about the North West trip given their regular communication.
“it is implausible when we have regard to her own evidence that she communicates regularly with the first wife”
Mr Carrim's wife and first wife communicate regularly, specifically about Mr Carrim's well-being and health.
“what they communicate about is Mr Carrim's well-being ... And his health”
Mr Carrim submits that public disclosure of this information would risk serious harm to his treatment, dignity, standing within his religious community and public life, place his children at further risk where threats have been made, and prejudice his wife's independent business and livelihood.
“Mr Carrim submits that public disclosure of this information would; risk serious harm to his treatment, dignity, standing within his religious community and public life; place his children at further risk in circumstances where threats have already been made; would prejudice his wife's independent business and livelihood, both of which have already been adversely affected by the publicity surrounding these proceedings”