unrated
procedural
70% conf.Advocate Johnson acknowledged omission to deal with Exhibit CJC 368 in the third statement.
“You say you omitted, in paragraph, you add that you omitted to deal with EXHIBIT CJC 368”
ADV SELLO SCDay 144 · 21 Jul 2026
Referred to as: Exhibit CJC 368 · EXHIBIT CJC 368
No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.
Advocate Johnson acknowledged omission to deal with Exhibit CJC 368 in the third statement.
“You say you omitted, in paragraph, you add that you omitted to deal with EXHIBIT CJC 368”
The witness and legal representatives understand the right against self-incrimination applies on a question-by-question basis and not as a blanket ban with respect to Exhibit CJC 368.
“you are not invoking a blanket ban dealing with the issues that are reflected in CJC 368 ... you invoke your right against self-incrimination in response to specific questions”
The witness omitted dealing with EXHIBIT CJC 368 in their third statement and clarifies that they invoke right against self-incrimination in response to specific questions, not a blanket ban.
“you omitted to deal with EXHIBIT CJC 368 ... you invoke your right against self-incrimination in response to specific questions, not that questions can be put to you ... there is no blanket, but it is on a question by question”