section 27 B

Advocate Johnson admits that there is no sufficient factual substratum to satisfy B of section 27, indicating lack of grounds in the affidavit supporting those suspicions under B of section 27.

“I have referred to those grounds ... I think the question ... is that sufficient for B?... In terms of the factual basis of it, yes.”

Advocate Johnson confirms he has applied his mind differently from before and agrees that the requirement of suspicion under section 27 B is fulfilled as there was knowledge and grounds on which it was based.

“I applied my mind differently ... I agree that it fulfils that requirement because he had knowledge. He had grounds on which it was based.”