No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.
Mr Carrim has been required to furnish certain information repeatedly but has not done so, unlike Mr Carrim who could do what was stated in the paragraphs referred to.
“Why is it that he cannot likewise do what he has been required to do, which is to furnish the information that has been requested repeatedly?”
The Chairperson explained the reason for going out of open session was to avoid divulging information that should not be publicly disclosed and referred Mr. Premhid to read certain paragraphs in-camera to him for questions.
“The reason for going out is that everybody will recall ... I asked Mr Premhid to read certain paragraphs for himself and then I put questions to him ... to avoid divulging the sort of information that I said in my ruling should not be divulged.”
The section 27 referral affidavit could not have made any difference to the decision even if the writer had sight of it, as it was accepted that there was nothing in it.
“But based on the engagement we had yesterday, the section 27 referral affidavit could not possibly have made any difference even if the writer of this legal report had had sight of it. It would not have made any difference. I say that because when I engaged you yesterday, you accepted that there was nothing there.”
There is a question as to why such a large amount of cash was carried while assisting in removing drugs from the system, but no cogent explanation has been provided.
“some may think you had that much cash to pay out those who had assisted in getting these drugs out of the system and taking them to whatever destination”