Carrim Suleiman

If Mr Mogotsi feels that in the absence of his information being provided or throwing Carrim Suleiman under the bus does not work out, then he has a problem moving forward, and that is where the inclination of biasness comes in.

“if as the events unfold and the conversations and the interactions, Mr Mogotsi starts feeling that in the absence of the failure to provide or to throw Carrim Suleiman under the bus does not work out, then he has got a problem moving forward. And that is where the inclination of biasness come in.”

The applicant Mr Mogotsi contends that the Evidence Leader suggested he could assist and protect him against giving evidence adverse to Mr Carrim Suleiman.

“the applicant in his papers say that the Evidence Leader had suggested that he can be able to assist him, he can be able to protect him in the event that he gives evidence that is adverse against Mr Carrim Suleiman”

The Chief Evidence Leader would not have invited others to listen if he intended to ask Mr Mogotsi for damaging information about Mr Carrim Suleiman.

“If the Chief Evidence Leader wanted to act improperly, would he have invited other people to come listen to him going to say to Mr Mogotsi, I want you to give any dirty you can give me on Mr Carrim. Would he have acted in that manner?”