No picture yet. Upload one or paste an image URL.
Geolocation data from Mr Carrim's cellphone was obtained showing his movements and was shared with his legal representatives on 17 July, prompting further affidavits.
“the Evidence Leaders obtained geolocation data. That is the data of Mr Carrim's cell phone that tracks the movements ... We presented that information to Mr Carrim's legal representatives on the 17th of July. That then prompted two further affidavits”
Geolocation data from Mr Carrim's cellphone was obtained and shared with his legal representatives on 17 July to track his movements.
“The Evidence Leaders obtained geolocation data. That is the data of Mr Carrim's cell phone that tracks the movements of the phone. We know from the first deponent that Mr Carrim keeps his phone with him. We presented that information to Mr Carrim's legal representatives on the 17th of July.”
Mr Matlala's legal representatives did not indicate any changes in facts that would make it impossible to comply with the undertaking made on 7 July, indicating the undertaking should still hold.
“Mr Matlala's legal representatives were informed by certain facts to conclude that they are in a position to make certain undertakings on his behalf. They do not come here and say, those facts have changed. They do not come here and say, since the undertaking was made, new facts have come to light that make it impossible for us to comply.”
It is inappropriate for a witness to raise a legal issue during the hearing that should have been resolved with their legal representatives.
“We cannot be addressed by your legal representatives and by you on a legal question which should have been resolved between you and your legal representatives.”
Mr Mogotsi was legally represented during his November 2025 testimony and his legal representatives did not object to the vigorous questioning he now complains about.
“When Mr Mogotsi testified then, he was legally represented. His legal representatives did not object to the questions... The complaint is only raised later when the witness is due to return to the witness box”