section 27B

Advocate Johnson agrees that there are no sufficient factual grounds in the affidavit to satisfy section 27B requirements.

“Wherein this affidavit do you find any grounds that can potentially get anywhere close to section 27 B? ... there is nothing more than just what he said here ... I think the question ... is it sufficient for B? ... Yes, you have accepted there was none.”

Advocate Johnson admits that his earlier understanding of section 27B was wrong, and he later agreed it was satisfied because the person had knowledge and grounds.

“I have applied my mind differently. ... At the time, yes, I agree that it fulfils that requirement because he had knowledge. He had grounds on which it was based. I can not change that answer.”