the treating doctor

The treating doctor of Mr Carrim states that his medical condition is dynamic and subject to change; the doctor proposes to update the Commission every two weeks about Mr Carrim's fitness to testify.

“the treating doctors says is that the position of my client is dynamic and it is subject to change ... the treating doctor himself proposes to account to the Commission under oath once every two weeks to update the Commission regarding the client's position and whether he can or cannot testify”

The replying affidavit regarding Mr Carrim's medical condition was confirmed by the treating doctor after consultation, affirming that the medical responses were doctor-confirmed despite being authored by a non-medical person.

“There has or should have been a signed confirmatory affidavit from the treating doctor in respect of the content of the replying affidavit and even if it does not say it in terms, I consulted with the doctor on X, Y and Z and he tells me here is the response. I would ask in a generous reading of that replying affidavit and the fact that it is confirmed by the doctor that the so-called medical responses are medical responses from a non-medical person but confirmed by the medical person themselves.”